Comments on: I made Phil Ripperger stand in line for an Xbox 360 http://scobleizer.com/2005/12/19/i-made-phil-ripperger-stand-in-line-for-an-xbox-360/ Exploring the 2010 Web Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:42:37 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Abhishek http://scobleizer.com/2005/12/19/i-made-phil-ripperger-stand-in-line-for-an-xbox-360/comment-page-2/#comment-114825 Abhishek Mon, 18 May 2009 07:54:19 +0000 http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2005/12/19/i-made-phil-ripperger-stand-in-line-for-an-xbox-360/#comment-114825 Hey Guys u know abt X box 360. its really interesting & exciting.just checkout this wwbsite. Hey Guys u know abt X box 360. its really interesting & exciting.just checkout this wwbsite.

]]> By: A Real-Life .NET to Rails rewrite « Curt’s Comments http://scobleizer.com/2005/12/19/i-made-phil-ripperger-stand-in-line-for-an-xbox-360/comment-page-2/#comment-6743 A Real-Life .NET to Rails rewrite « Curt’s Comments Mon, 09 Oct 2006 02:54:48 +0000 http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2005/12/19/i-made-phil-ripperger-stand-in-line-for-an-xbox-360/#comment-6743 [...] Yesterday, I commented on a blog post by Microsoft’s Robert Scoble who asked why developers are leaving .NET for Ruby on Rails. As I said then, the post itself was short, but there were many comments posted, and a lot of those posts directly answered his question. [...] [...] Yesterday, I commented on a blog post by Microsoft’s Robert Scoble who asked why developers are leaving .NET for Ruby on Rails. As I said then, the post itself was short, but there were many comments posted, and a lot of those posts directly answered his question. [...]

]]> By: Why are developers abandoning .NET for Rails « Curt’s Comments http://scobleizer.com/2005/12/19/i-made-phil-ripperger-stand-in-line-for-an-xbox-360/comment-page-2/#comment-6744 Why are developers abandoning .NET for Rails « Curt’s Comments Mon, 09 Oct 2006 02:54:17 +0000 http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2005/12/19/i-made-phil-ripperger-stand-in-line-for-an-xbox-360/#comment-6744 [...] Microsoft’s Robert Scoble wants to know why developers are leaving .NET for Ruby on Rails. The post itself is short, but there are a lot of comments posted. [...] [...] Microsoft’s Robert Scoble wants to know why developers are leaving .NET for Ruby on Rails. The post itself is short, but there are a lot of comments posted. [...]

]]> By: Thomas Lucero http://scobleizer.com/2005/12/19/i-made-phil-ripperger-stand-in-line-for-an-xbox-360/comment-page-2/#comment-6742 Thomas Lucero Fri, 14 Jul 2006 07:31:32 +0000 http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2005/12/19/i-made-phil-ripperger-stand-in-line-for-an-xbox-360/#comment-6742 I am in the process of early design/architecture of a multiplayer computer game. As part of my never-ending search for knowledge, I ran across ruby on the XProgramming.com site by Ron Jeffries, and that led me to Ruby on Rails, which led me to Ajaz... and fell in love with the ruby language syntax. I liked python, but either it or I was not up to enterprise/bet my paycheck standards for larger projects. Anyhow, after reading enough of the Programming Ruby book, I decided to give Linux another chance (I'd tried a SuSe, version 4 or 5, and Mandrake, versions 6-8. I searched through my cd collection, found a copy of DSL Linux, noted that my newer computer had more than 50 mb free drive space, and used the Mepis burn instead. Well, it had ruby 1.8.2 and, more importantly, did not have irb, RDoc and a couple other things. And the Debian apt-get said, sorry, ask again later. So I gritted my teeth and installed ruby from source. And it gave ruby -v -> 1.8.2. I modified Makefile to use /usr instead oof /usr/local. ruby -v -> 1.8.2. Hmmm. After a snack, I modified config for /usr instead of /usr. ruby -v 1.8.4! I verified that Hello, world and irb ran, intalled gems and installed rails. Due to not using Linux/root for about 5 years, this project (from deciding I wanted Linux at home to getting a rails project running) took - almost 8 hours. How long would it take, from deciding I needed a new version of Windows to installing a major new app on my new OS, with major glitches at each step? (I omitted the glitches for brevity). A week? Three weeks? $1500? An MSDN purchase? Oh, yes. I was a software developer from 1974 to 2002. My last project was a conversion TO IBM 390 MVS (that's to, not from). Before that, I was a .NET developer (anyone want a few beta 2 coasters?). Anyhow, I'm advising my friends to short MSFT and SUNW, and hedge with a long AMD. I expect major new developments will encourage sales of new computers. The biggest of these is new apps using ruby/rails/ajax flying out the door in 3-9 months. Anyone hiring RoR programmers? I am in the process of early design/architecture of a multiplayer computer game. As part of my never-ending search for knowledge, I ran across ruby on the XProgramming.com site by Ron Jeffries, and that led me to Ruby on Rails, which led me to Ajaz… and fell in love with the ruby language syntax. I liked python, but either it or I was not up to enterprise/bet my paycheck standards for larger projects.

Anyhow, after reading enough of the Programming Ruby book, I decided to give Linux another chance (I’d tried a SuSe, version 4 or 5, and Mandrake, versions 6-8. I searched through my cd collection, found a copy of DSL Linux, noted that my newer computer had more than 50 mb free drive space, and used the Mepis burn instead.

Well, it had ruby 1.8.2 and, more importantly, did not have irb, RDoc and a couple other things. And the Debian apt-get said, sorry, ask again later. So I gritted my teeth and installed ruby from source. And it gave ruby -v -> 1.8.2. I modified Makefile to use /usr instead oof /usr/local. ruby -v -> 1.8.2. Hmmm.

After a snack, I modified config for /usr instead of /usr. ruby -v 1.8.4! I verified that Hello, world and irb ran, intalled gems and installed rails. Due to not using Linux/root for about 5 years, this project (from deciding I wanted Linux at home to getting a rails project running) took – almost 8 hours.

How long would it take, from deciding I needed a new version of Windows to installing a major new app on my new OS, with major glitches at each step? (I omitted the glitches for brevity). A week? Three weeks? $1500? An MSDN purchase?

Oh, yes. I was a software developer from 1974 to 2002. My last project was a conversion TO IBM 390 MVS (that’s to, not from). Before that, I was a .NET developer (anyone want a few beta 2 coasters?).

Anyhow, I’m advising my friends to short MSFT and SUNW, and hedge with a long AMD. I expect major new developments will encourage sales of new computers. The biggest of these is new apps using ruby/rails/ajax flying out the door in 3-9 months.

Anyone hiring RoR programmers?

]]> By: Nitin http://scobleizer.com/2005/12/19/i-made-phil-ripperger-stand-in-line-for-an-xbox-360/comment-page-2/#comment-6741 Nitin Thu, 25 May 2006 12:52:03 +0000 http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2005/12/19/i-made-phil-ripperger-stand-in-line-for-an-xbox-360/#comment-6741 I am a software engg. and before days i m working in .NET but now days i m working in Rails. i Think its a more user friendly compair to .NET. I am a software engg. and before days i m working in .NET but now days i m working in Rails. i Think its a more user friendly compair to .NET.

]]> By: Dynamic vs Static languages… FIGHT! at The News before The News http://scobleizer.com/2005/12/19/i-made-phil-ripperger-stand-in-line-for-an-xbox-360/comment-page-2/#comment-6740 Dynamic vs Static languages… FIGHT! at The News before The News Thu, 16 Mar 2006 01:46:19 +0000 http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2005/12/19/i-made-phil-ripperger-stand-in-line-for-an-xbox-360/#comment-6740 [...] Interpreting the language (Ruby, Python, whatever) to native JVM/CLR bytecode is only half the battle however. When the standard libraries for those languages are implemented through the underlying capabilities of java.* or System.* things will really get cooking. In my opinion, whichever of the JVM or CLR can get Ruby (and Rails) to run seamlessly on their platforms first will win a lot of kudos in the enterprise space as they will gain the productivity of Ruby/Rails, plus the integration with alot of ‘native’ Java/.NET code. The JRuby project is already making progress in this direction (albeit without Sun’s help). Scoble asked late last year what MS could do to make ASP.NET development more appealing. Get Ruby & Rails to run on the CLR, that’s how! [...] [...] Interpreting the language (Ruby, Python, whatever) to native JVM/CLR bytecode is only half the battle however. When the standard libraries for those languages are implemented through the underlying capabilities of java.* or System.* things will really get cooking. In my opinion, whichever of the JVM or CLR can get Ruby (and Rails) to run seamlessly on their platforms first will win a lot of kudos in the enterprise space as they will gain the productivity of Ruby/Rails, plus the integration with alot of ‘native’ Java/.NET code. The JRuby project is already making progress in this direction (albeit without Sun’s help). Scoble asked late last year what MS could do to make ASP.NET development more appealing. Get Ruby & Rails to run on the CLR, that’s how! [...]

]]>