<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The role of anti-marketing design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scobleizer.com/2006/03/04/the-role-of-anti-marketing-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/03/04/the-role-of-anti-marketing-design/</link>
	<description>Searching for world-changing technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 05:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/03/04/the-role-of-anti-marketing-design/comment-page-11/#comment-129357</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/03/04/the-role-of-anti-marketing-design/#comment-129357</guid>
		<description>This article is ridiculous the claim that because something is ugly it does well.   Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://DateandRate.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DateandRate.com&lt;/a&gt; just started looks way better than them, probably doesnt make as much money. But im willing to bet in 2 years theyll be bigger than &lt;a href=&quot;http://PlentyofFish.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PlentyofFish.com&lt;/a&gt;.  The fact of the matter is it does matter how your website looks and how its designed.   Im sure their income comes from some job or old money that some guy feels like spending on his website.   Its all about outcome of advertising dollars and the competition,  free dating sites???  How many of them are really out there? I can tell you not alot.. and definitely alot of them arent like the site I told you &lt;a href=&quot;http://about%28DateandRate.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;about(DateandRate.com&lt;/a&gt;) so it leaves for little competition until recently.   All I have to say is I predict this site will expand faster then POF has thus far with the same amount of time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is ridiculous the claim that because something is ugly it does well.   Check out <a href="http://DateandRate.com" rel="nofollow">DateandRate.com</a> just started looks way better than them, probably doesnt make as much money. But im willing to bet in 2 years theyll be bigger than <a href="http://PlentyofFish.com" rel="nofollow">PlentyofFish.com</a>.  The fact of the matter is it does matter how your website looks and how its designed.   Im sure their income comes from some job or old money that some guy feels like spending on his website.   Its all about outcome of advertising dollars and the competition,  free dating sites???  How many of them are really out there? I can tell you not alot.. and definitely alot of them arent like the site I told you <a href="http://about%28DateandRate.com" rel="nofollow">about(DateandRate.com</a>) so it leaves for little competition until recently.   All I have to say is I predict this site will expand faster then POF has thus far with the same amount of time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/03/04/the-role-of-anti-marketing-design/comment-page-11/#comment-119210</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/03/04/the-role-of-anti-marketing-design/#comment-119210</guid>
		<description>This article is ridiculous the claim that because something is ugly it does well.   Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://DateandRate.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DateandRate.com&lt;/a&gt; just started looks way better than them, probably doesnt make as much money. But im willing to bet in 2 years theyll be bigger than &lt;a href=&quot;http://PlentyofFish.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PlentyofFish.com&lt;/a&gt;.  The fact of the matter is it does matter how your website looks and how its designed.   Im sure their income comes from some job or old money that some guy feels like spending on his website.   Its all about outcome of advertising dollars and the competition,  free dating sites???  How many of them are really out there? I can tell you not alot.. and definitely alot of them arent like the site I told you &lt;a href=&quot;http://about%28DateandRate.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;about(DateandRate.com&lt;/a&gt;) so it leaves for little competition until recently.   All I have to say is I predict this site will expand faster then POF has thus far with the same amount of time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is ridiculous the claim that because something is ugly it does well.   Check out <a href="http://DateandRate.com" rel="nofollow">DateandRate.com</a> just started looks way better than them, probably doesnt make as much money. But im willing to bet in 2 years theyll be bigger than <a href="http://PlentyofFish.com" rel="nofollow">PlentyofFish.com</a>.  The fact of the matter is it does matter how your website looks and how its designed.   Im sure their income comes from some job or old money that some guy feels like spending on his website.   Its all about outcome of advertising dollars and the competition,  free dating sites???  How many of them are really out there? I can tell you not alot.. and definitely alot of them arent like the site I told you <a href="http://about%28DateandRate.com" rel="nofollow">about(DateandRate.com</a>) so it leaves for little competition until recently.   All I have to say is I predict this site will expand faster then POF has thus far with the same amount of time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waarom een zuigend webdesign werkt &#187; Ablog</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/03/04/the-role-of-anti-marketing-design/comment-page-11/#comment-115365</link>
		<dc:creator>Waarom een zuigend webdesign werkt &#187; Ablog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/03/04/the-role-of-anti-marketing-design/#comment-115365</guid>
		<description>[...] uitziende websites en dat dit eigenlijk antimarketing zou zijn, er was ook een verwijzing naar een artikel over antimarketing. In het kort schuift dit artikel Plenty off Fish, Craigs List, Google en MySpace [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] uitziende websites en dat dit eigenlijk antimarketing zou zijn, er was ook een verwijzing naar een artikel over antimarketing. In het kort schuift dit artikel Plenty off Fish, Craigs List, Google en MySpace [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Labnotes &#187; The design movement that never happened</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/03/04/the-role-of-anti-marketing-design/comment-page-11/#comment-16132</link>
		<dc:creator>Labnotes &#187; The design movement that never happened</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/03/04/the-role-of-anti-marketing-design/#comment-16132</guid>
		<description>[...] site. Therefore, ugly is successful. Or at least that&#8217;s the impression you got from reading Robert Scoble, Aidan Henry, Joshua Porter, and many others. For a while there in 2006, I really thought [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] site. Therefore, ugly is successful. Or at least that&#8217;s the impression you got from reading Robert Scoble, Aidan Henry, Joshua Porter, and many others. For a while there in 2006, I really thought [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petter</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/03/04/the-role-of-anti-marketing-design/comment-page-11/#comment-16131</link>
		<dc:creator>petter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/03/04/the-role-of-anti-marketing-design/#comment-16131</guid>
		<description>yes, simple design is too great for sites because its open time is too few and its better for sites....some of the other sites have too simple but they are popular like that plentyoffish sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, simple design is too great for sites because its open time is too few and its better for sites&#8230;.some of the other sites have too simple but they are popular like that plentyoffish sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petter</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/03/04/the-role-of-anti-marketing-design/comment-page-11/#comment-151540</link>
		<dc:creator>petter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/03/04/the-role-of-anti-marketing-design/#comment-151540</guid>
		<description>yes, simple design is too great for sites because its open time is too few and its better for sites....some of the other sites have too simple but they are popular like that plentyoffish sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, simple design is too great for sites because its open time is too few and its better for sites&#8230;.some of the other sites have too simple but they are popular like that plentyoffish sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

