Dear Al Gore: here’s some inconvenient truths

Coal on way to global warming

I read your book today, an Inconvenient Truth. Great book, I wish everyone would read it, but the ones who really need to read it probably won’t. I guess that’s inconvenient truth #1.

When I was in college I wrote a lot of editorials. Imagine that! Heheh. But — by far — the most unpopular one I wrote was when I advocated raising gas taxes by several dollars to encourage Americans to buy smaller cars and to encourage the car industry to come out with smaller and more fuel efficient cars.

That taught me the depth of the problem. We aren’t willing to face the hard truths.

Hey, Al, even you aren’t willing to propose one of the best answers: nuclear power.

Why? Cause you know that proposing getting rid of the coal trains with nuclear power will immediately get you written off as a wacko. You know where those coal trains are going, don’t you (I took that picture in Livingston, Montana)? There’s a reason why we’re all building data centers in Eastern Washington — there’s low-cost access to coal and hydroelectric power.

While I’m on the environmental kick, our industry has a lot to do.

One thing we could do? Get workers to turn off lights in their offices when they go home. I work a lot of late nights and I try to turn off a few lights. It’s amazing how few people care. And, drive around Silicon Valley some evening and you’ll see that most of us in this industry don’t turn off lights.

Our society is doomed and we aren’t able to come up with real solutions. Oh, buying a hybrid SUV is NOT a solution. I wish we were leaving Patrick a better world, but I don’t see it getting better. It’s gonna get worse — a lot worse.

Wake me up when public pressure turns on our politicians to solve these problems with real solutions. Sigh.

  • Farid Mashhadi

    “Wake me up when public pressure turns on our politicians to solve these problems with real solutions. Sigh. ”

    Robert, let’s reverse the situation.

    Smart companies must come up with real solutions and implement them. Never mind the politicians, most of them are ignorant and massively incompetent to even comprehend what is at stake here.

    I have given up on politicians. Afterall, how many John F Kennedy’s we have had in the past decades.

  • Farid Mashhadi

    “Wake me up when public pressure turns on our politicians to solve these problems with real solutions. Sigh. ”

    Robert, let’s reverse the situation.

    Smart companies must come up with real solutions and implement them. Never mind the politicians, most of them are ignorant and massively incompetent to even comprehend what is at stake here.

    I have given up on politicians. Afterall, how many John F Kennedy’s we have had in the past decades.

  • http://lauriblog.wordpress.com/ Lauri

    Farid,

    JFK (the first one) wasnt all that awesome of a president.. he did, however, not have a rabid media at his backside 24/7.

    “Camelot” was a made up fiction, brought about by Jackie Kennedy.

    Ronald, Reagan, now THAT was a president!

  • http://lauriblog.wordpress.com/ Lauri

    Farid,

    JFK (the first one) wasnt all that awesome of a president.. he did, however, not have a rabid media at his backside 24/7.

    “Camelot” was a made up fiction, brought about by Jackie Kennedy.

    Ronald, Reagan, now THAT was a president!

  • http://rss.monroe-kc.com/ James M

    Still no solution. Still trying to win!

  • http://rss.monroe-kc.com James M

    Still no solution. Still trying to win!

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • Wesley Parish

    I read a recent edition, 12/6/2006, of New Scientist, the UK-based science mag. Regarding nuclear power and pollution, it had a very interesting article on the invisible part of the problem – the people living where the uranium mine tailings get stored.

    And an interesting article on ‘Captain William’s great obsession’ by Geoff Watts:
    http://www.pol.ac.uk/home/documents/pol_new_scientist_article_19_06_06.doc

    Which has the interesting words:
    “This long stretch of data provides clear evidence that sea level has been rising since the 18th century and that it began to accelerate during the second half of the 19th century – which is what you would expect if today’s climate change is related to our output of greenhouse gases.”

    Food for thought. People aren’t hungry?

  • Wesley Parish

    I read a recent edition, 12/6/2006, of New Scientist, the UK-based science mag. Regarding nuclear power and pollution, it had a very interesting article on the invisible part of the problem – the people living where the uranium mine tailings get stored.

    And an interesting article on ‘Captain William’s great obsession’ by Geoff Watts:
    http://www.pol.ac.uk/home/documents/pol_new_scientist_article_19_06_06.doc

    Which has the interesting words:
    “This long stretch of data provides clear evidence that sea level has been rising since the 18th century and that it began to accelerate during the second half of the 19th century – which is what you would expect if today’s climate change is related to our output of greenhouse gases.”

    Food for thought. People aren’t hungry?

  • Pingback: Web Strategy by Jeremiah » Scoble’s Casual Communication Style

  • http://www.philosophicalgeek.com/ Ben

    I have not read An Inconvenient Truth, but will do so once it’s available at the library. I picked it up at Barnes and Noble and flipped through it, but the whole layout and design seemed designed to play on emotion, not fact.

    Article that shows there is no consensus:

    http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597

  • http://www.philosophicalgeek.com Ben

    I have not read An Inconvenient Truth, but will do so once it’s available at the library. I picked it up at Barnes and Noble and flipped through it, but the whole layout and design seemed designed to play on emotion, not fact.

    Article that shows there is no consensus:

    http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597

  • Doug

    What does Nuclear Power do for gas consumption with regard to transportation?

    Using plug-in hybrid cars we can off-load some of current transportation fuel needs to the electric grid.

    What does Nuclear Power do for petroleum consumption with regard to plastic?

    Oil not used for vehicles is saved for the chemical industry. Coal not burned for electricity is also freed up for use as a feedstock for up to 100s of years.

    What does Nuclear Power do to address the not inconsiderable expenses involved with finding a place to store the trash from them. Even the transmutation process ain’t free, and it ain’t perfect. Are you going to make sure that we can process all the waste generated by replaceing ALL our non-nuclear power generation with nuclear BEFORE we start generating tons of waste?

    As opposed to coal-fired plants, which just dump their wastes to the atmosphere, in quantities far greater than the amount of nuclear waste. Huge empty areas exist all over the world that would make suitable storage sites. Waste can be reprocessed to eliminate the long-lived wastes (and turn it back into usable fuel). The most radioactive wastes also have the shorted half-lives (on the order of 30-40 years).

    Where does the money come from to build the next generation of Nuclear power plants in the numbers needed to replace coal and oil fired?

    Where’s it going to come from to build any other type of power plant? Or are you just having fun pointing out that we were foolish to be duped by antinuclear activists into building fossil-powered plants for the past few decades?

    How long does it take to build a nuke plant? Test it? certify it? Find the engineers to staff it, ’cause you ain’t outsourcing it, and you ain’t getting those folks for the bottom dollar.

    It takes 2 years to build a plant with a standardized design, 5 if you go through the normal level of legal bullshit, and an infinitely long time if you allow anti-nuclear lawyers tie you up in court while spouting utopian rubbish about how conservation and renewables alone can replace fossil energy sources.

  • Doug

    What does Nuclear Power do for gas consumption with regard to transportation?

    Using plug-in hybrid cars we can off-load some of current transportation fuel needs to the electric grid.

    What does Nuclear Power do for petroleum consumption with regard to plastic?

    Oil not used for vehicles is saved for the chemical industry. Coal not burned for electricity is also freed up for use as a feedstock for up to 100s of years.

    What does Nuclear Power do to address the not inconsiderable expenses involved with finding a place to store the trash from them. Even the transmutation process ain’t free, and it ain’t perfect. Are you going to make sure that we can process all the waste generated by replaceing ALL our non-nuclear power generation with nuclear BEFORE we start generating tons of waste?

    As opposed to coal-fired plants, which just dump their wastes to the atmosphere, in quantities far greater than the amount of nuclear waste. Huge empty areas exist all over the world that would make suitable storage sites. Waste can be reprocessed to eliminate the long-lived wastes (and turn it back into usable fuel). The most radioactive wastes also have the shorted half-lives (on the order of 30-40 years).

    Where does the money come from to build the next generation of Nuclear power plants in the numbers needed to replace coal and oil fired?

    Where’s it going to come from to build any other type of power plant? Or are you just having fun pointing out that we were foolish to be duped by antinuclear activists into building fossil-powered plants for the past few decades?

    How long does it take to build a nuke plant? Test it? certify it? Find the engineers to staff it, ’cause you ain’t outsourcing it, and you ain’t getting those folks for the bottom dollar.

    It takes 2 years to build a plant with a standardized design, 5 if you go through the normal level of legal bullshit, and an infinitely long time if you allow anti-nuclear lawyers tie you up in court while spouting utopian rubbish about how conservation and renewables alone can replace fossil energy sources.

  • Paulina

    Hey all.
    I was just around and well, its some kind of crazy idea we have in my class. We are all wondering if Al Gore would like to come to our University with his conference. Its a matter of some students that would be pleased if this man could come to Mexico. Do you guys know where can we ask for this request needed?

  • Paulina

    Hey all.
    I was just around and well, its some kind of crazy idea we have in my class. We are all wondering if Al Gore would like to come to our University with his conference. Its a matter of some students that would be pleased if this man could come to Mexico. Do you guys know where can we ask for this request needed?

  • Malene Flagga

    I’ve read here on this page, that some people believe there is no consensus among climate researchers as to the cause of global warming. I wonder why that is, since there IS consensus. No scientist in the field of climate thinks CO2 is not a major contributor to the current climate changes. It is people from other fields, writing as if though they know what they’re talking about, who tries to spread doubts.

    Find me ONE professional, university educated climate expert who claims manmade CO2 is not changing our climate, please.

  • Malene Flagga

    I’ve read here on this page, that some people believe there is no consensus among climate researchers as to the cause of global warming. I wonder why that is, since there IS consensus. No scientist in the field of climate thinks CO2 is not a major contributor to the current climate changes. It is people from other fields, writing as if though they know what they’re talking about, who tries to spread doubts.

    Find me ONE professional, university educated climate expert who claims manmade CO2 is not changing our climate, please.