<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Latest Windows Vista builds get praise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/30/latest-windows-vista-builds-get-praise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/30/latest-windows-vista-builds-get-praise/</link>
	<description>Searching for world-changing technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 05:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/30/latest-windows-vista-builds-get-praise/comment-page-3/#comment-37364</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/08/30/latest-windows-vista-builds-get-praise/#comment-37364</guid>
		<description>Alan Wilenski said &quot;I have bad feeling about the whole vista mess.&quot;

How right he was!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan Wilenski said &#8220;I have bad feeling about the whole vista mess.&#8221;</p>
<p>How right he was!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/30/latest-windows-vista-builds-get-praise/comment-page-3/#comment-171447</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/08/30/latest-windows-vista-builds-get-praise/#comment-171447</guid>
		<description>Alan Wilenski said &quot;I have bad feeling about the whole vista mess.&quot;

How right he was!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan Wilenski said &#8220;I have bad feeling about the whole vista mess.&#8221;</p>
<p>How right he was!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STUFFLEUFAGUS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Entire Windows Vista Story (from my perspective)</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/30/latest-windows-vista-builds-get-praise/comment-page-3/#comment-37362</link>
		<dc:creator>STUFFLEUFAGUS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Entire Windows Vista Story (from my perspective)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 03:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/08/30/latest-windows-vista-builds-get-praise/#comment-37362</guid>
		<description>[...] About a month later I downloaded build 5536.  I blogged about that release here, and linked back to Scoble&#8217;s original post (see above Scoble post, comment # 131).  That caused a lot of links, and a lot of positive coverage of the progress Microsoft was making with Vista.  It was Digg&#8217;d even.  My own little blog got a lot of hits over that post.  Personally, I was very happy - I had a version of Vista that ran extremely well.  Scoble followed up with a link to my post with this new post on his blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] About a month later I downloaded build 5536.  I blogged about that release here, and linked back to Scoble&#8217;s original post (see above Scoble post, comment # 131).  That caused a lot of links, and a lot of positive coverage of the progress Microsoft was making with Vista.  It was Digg&#8217;d even.  My own little blog got a lot of hits over that post.  Personally, I was very happy &#8211; I had a version of Vista that ran extremely well.  Scoble followed up with a link to my post with this new post on his blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/30/latest-windows-vista-builds-get-praise/comment-page-3/#comment-37363</link>
		<dc:creator>Lincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/08/30/latest-windows-vista-builds-get-praise/#comment-37363</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been running Vista RC1 with Beta 2 of Office 2007. So far so good. The new interface is clean and uncluttered very similar to the theme in IE7 and WMP11 Beta. My only complaint is the ability to revert to the classic view. I wish Microsoft would take it out. I currently do HelpDesk support and don&#039;t ever set XP to the classic view, setting up as few icons on the desktop as possible. I believe it&#039;s much more efficient. I looked, and unfortunately this view is still available in the Vista RC1. As I have tried to explain to users who usually have several programs open, it&#039;s much more efficient to access these through the Quick Launch besides the fact that most new programs seem to install to the desktop, Quick Launch and Taskbar. I also select to show the desktop toolbar on the taskbar which shows all the icons that are normally shown on the desktop of the classic view. Overall though, I think Microsoft is headed in the right direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been running Vista RC1 with Beta 2 of Office 2007. So far so good. The new interface is clean and uncluttered very similar to the theme in IE7 and WMP11 Beta. My only complaint is the ability to revert to the classic view. I wish Microsoft would take it out. I currently do HelpDesk support and don&#8217;t ever set XP to the classic view, setting up as few icons on the desktop as possible. I believe it&#8217;s much more efficient. I looked, and unfortunately this view is still available in the Vista RC1. As I have tried to explain to users who usually have several programs open, it&#8217;s much more efficient to access these through the Quick Launch besides the fact that most new programs seem to install to the desktop, Quick Launch and Taskbar. I also select to show the desktop toolbar on the taskbar which shows all the icons that are normally shown on the desktop of the classic view. Overall though, I think Microsoft is headed in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/30/latest-windows-vista-builds-get-praise/comment-page-3/#comment-171446</link>
		<dc:creator>Lincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/08/30/latest-windows-vista-builds-get-praise/#comment-171446</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been running Vista RC1 with Beta 2 of Office 2007. So far so good. The new interface is clean and uncluttered very similar to the theme in IE7 and WMP11 Beta. My only complaint is the ability to revert to the classic view. I wish Microsoft would take it out. I currently do HelpDesk support and don&#039;t ever set XP to the classic view, setting up as few icons on the desktop as possible. I believe it&#039;s much more efficient. I looked, and unfortunately this view is still available in the Vista RC1. As I have tried to explain to users who usually have several programs open, it&#039;s much more efficient to access these through the Quick Launch besides the fact that most new programs seem to install to the desktop, Quick Launch and Taskbar. I also select to show the desktop toolbar on the taskbar which shows all the icons that are normally shown on the desktop of the classic view. Overall though, I think Microsoft is headed in the right direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been running Vista RC1 with Beta 2 of Office 2007. So far so good. The new interface is clean and uncluttered very similar to the theme in IE7 and WMP11 Beta. My only complaint is the ability to revert to the classic view. I wish Microsoft would take it out. I currently do HelpDesk support and don&#8217;t ever set XP to the classic view, setting up as few icons on the desktop as possible. I believe it&#8217;s much more efficient. I looked, and unfortunately this view is still available in the Vista RC1. As I have tried to explain to users who usually have several programs open, it&#8217;s much more efficient to access these through the Quick Launch besides the fact that most new programs seem to install to the desktop, Quick Launch and Taskbar. I also select to show the desktop toolbar on the taskbar which shows all the icons that are normally shown on the desktop of the classic view. Overall though, I think Microsoft is headed in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darcey</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/30/latest-windows-vista-builds-get-praise/comment-page-3/#comment-37301</link>
		<dc:creator>Darcey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 07:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/08/30/latest-windows-vista-builds-get-praise/#comment-37301</guid>
		<description>It amazes me how upset and angry some of you get when you hear people praising microsoft&#039;s products. If you don&#039;t like or aprove of the software MS puts out then just don&#039;t use it. why does it bother you so much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It amazes me how upset and angry some of you get when you hear people praising microsoft&#8217;s products. If you don&#8217;t like or aprove of the software MS puts out then just don&#8217;t use it. why does it bother you so much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

