<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon next Google? Maybe not&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/10/amazon-next-google-maybe-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/10/amazon-next-google-maybe-not/</link>
	<description>Searching for world-changing technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sioux Falls</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/10/amazon-next-google-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-38836</link>
		<dc:creator>Sioux Falls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/09/10/amazon-next-google-maybe-not/#comment-38836</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to say hi, thanks and bye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say hi, thanks and bye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sioux Falls</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/10/amazon-next-google-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-172728</link>
		<dc:creator>Sioux Falls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/09/10/amazon-next-google-maybe-not/#comment-172728</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to say hi, thanks and bye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say hi, thanks and bye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podesta</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/10/amazon-next-google-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-38833</link>
		<dc:creator>Podesta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 05:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/09/10/amazon-next-google-maybe-not/#comment-38833</guid>
		<description>Paul said:

&quot;Um…what’s the iPod exactly? A single platform. Put down the Kool Aid (or should we call it Apple Juice?) and take a deep breath.&quot;

Wrong, bucko.  iTunes and the iPod are compatible with more platforms than anything else -- OS X, Windows, Motorola and Cingular cell phones and Linux with a little tweaking.  If you want to criticize the iTunes/iPod phenom, it should be for FairPlay, the DRM, not platform incompatibility.  That is not a valid criticism.  But, be careful since most other download services and MP3 players use a flavor of DRM, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul said:</p>
<p>&#8220;Um…what’s the iPod exactly? A single platform. Put down the Kool Aid (or should we call it Apple Juice?) and take a deep breath.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wrong, bucko.  iTunes and the iPod are compatible with more platforms than anything else &#8212; OS X, Windows, Motorola and Cingular cell phones and Linux with a little tweaking.  If you want to criticize the iTunes/iPod phenom, it should be for FairPlay, the DRM, not platform incompatibility.  That is not a valid criticism.  But, be careful since most other download services and MP3 players use a flavor of DRM, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podesta</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/10/amazon-next-google-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-172725</link>
		<dc:creator>Podesta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 05:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/09/10/amazon-next-google-maybe-not/#comment-172725</guid>
		<description>Paul said:

&quot;Um…what’s the iPod exactly? A single platform. Put down the Kool Aid (or should we call it Apple Juice?) and take a deep breath.&quot;

Wrong, bucko.  iTunes and the iPod are compatible with more platforms than anything else -- OS X, Windows, Motorola and Cingular cell phones and Linux with a little tweaking.  If you want to criticize the iTunes/iPod phenom, it should be for FairPlay, the DRM, not platform incompatibility.  That is not a valid criticism.  But, be careful since most other download services and MP3 players use a flavor of DRM, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul said:</p>
<p>&#8220;Um…what’s the iPod exactly? A single platform. Put down the Kool Aid (or should we call it Apple Juice?) and take a deep breath.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wrong, bucko.  iTunes and the iPod are compatible with more platforms than anything else &#8212; OS X, Windows, Motorola and Cingular cell phones and Linux with a little tweaking.  If you want to criticize the iTunes/iPod phenom, it should be for FairPlay, the DRM, not platform incompatibility.  That is not a valid criticism.  But, be careful since most other download services and MP3 players use a flavor of DRM, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/10/amazon-next-google-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-38819</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 00:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/09/10/amazon-next-google-maybe-not/#comment-38819</guid>
		<description>Amazon&#039;s first mistake was relying on Windows Media Player DRM.  That right there cuts off half of the most valuable, informed market: Mac and Linux users.

Google gets it.  YouTube gets it.  They provide their video in flash 7 format with the understanding that a third-party extension exists to allow viewing that content on any computer on any operating system.

In a rush to appease movie studios by implementing a draconian, proprietary DRM whose development Amazon itself cannot control, it has shot itself in the foot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon&#8217;s first mistake was relying on Windows Media Player DRM.  That right there cuts off half of the most valuable, informed market: Mac and Linux users.</p>
<p>Google gets it.  YouTube gets it.  They provide their video in flash 7 format with the understanding that a third-party extension exists to allow viewing that content on any computer on any operating system.</p>
<p>In a rush to appease movie studios by implementing a draconian, proprietary DRM whose development Amazon itself cannot control, it has shot itself in the foot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/10/amazon-next-google-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-172711</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 00:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/09/10/amazon-next-google-maybe-not/#comment-172711</guid>
		<description>Amazon&#039;s first mistake was relying on Windows Media Player DRM.  That right there cuts off half of the most valuable, informed market: Mac and Linux users.

Google gets it.  YouTube gets it.  They provide their video in flash 7 format with the understanding that a third-party extension exists to allow viewing that content on any computer on any operating system.

In a rush to appease movie studios by implementing a draconian, proprietary DRM whose development Amazon itself cannot control, it has shot itself in the foot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon&#8217;s first mistake was relying on Windows Media Player DRM.  That right there cuts off half of the most valuable, informed market: Mac and Linux users.</p>
<p>Google gets it.  YouTube gets it.  They provide their video in flash 7 format with the understanding that a third-party extension exists to allow viewing that content on any computer on any operating system.</p>
<p>In a rush to appease movie studios by implementing a draconian, proprietary DRM whose development Amazon itself cannot control, it has shot itself in the foot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

