I love this new two-minute rule for email from Eric Mack (delete all email that takes more than two minutes to answer). I woke up today to find 48 new emails waiting. Damn, and it’s Sunday. Imagine how many I’ll have on Monday.
This is the problem with answering email — it generates more email.
IMing workmates solves a lot of email clutter, straight questions, straight answers, less email…. ooh the joy.
IMing workmates solves a lot of email clutter, straight questions, straight answers, less email…. ooh the joy.
Haven’t you asked / begged to have this problem / opportunity by advertising your email address all over the place?
Haven’t you asked / begged to have this problem / opportunity by advertising your email address all over the place?
You dope, Robert. Are you saying you’re only interested in shallow relationships? C’mon. I bet you can apply a bit more subtlety to your incoming messages. It sounds pretty crummy to say “hey, if you have something in depth to say, screw you. I won’t even reply, I’ll just zap your email.” How about:
“I want to give your email some careful thought, so I’ll reply at more length later (or give you a call). But I wanted you to know I got your email. Thanks!”
Or if it’s not something you’re interested in or if it’s not someone to whom you have a relationship with, then what about “Thanks for writing me. Unfortunately I don’t have resources to give your email the time and care it deserves.”
Or, hey, here’s a thought, ignore 10 2-minute trivial replies and use the time to…start a load of laundry *vbg*.
You dope, Robert. Are you saying you’re only interested in shallow relationships? C’mon. I bet you can apply a bit more subtlety to your incoming messages. It sounds pretty crummy to say “hey, if you have something in depth to say, screw you. I won’t even reply, I’ll just zap your email.” How about:
“I want to give your email some careful thought, so I’ll reply at more length later (or give you a call). But I wanted you to know I got your email. Thanks!”
Or if it’s not something you’re interested in or if it’s not someone to whom you have a relationship with, then what about “Thanks for writing me. Unfortunately I don’t have resources to give your email the time and care it deserves.”
Or, hey, here’s a thought, ignore 10 2-minute trivial replies and use the time to…start a load of laundry *vbg*.
[...] Robert Scoble mentions a two minute email rule, from Eric Mack. I think that’s a bad rule that only treats symptoms. I’ve also noticed that most people complaining about commenting on too much email are the people who most often beg for email in all their communication. They often say, “Email that to me or else I’ll forget.” They often say, “I get so much email, it’s better to respond _(fill in the blank)_ this way.” They often say, “I’m so behind on email.” They often say, “Here is my email address. I don’t know why _(insert name here)_ didn’t contact me directly. I have my email address and contact info posted all over the place.” The problem with answering email is not that it generates more email. The problem with setting up a system that keeps adding fuel to the fire is that the fire often gets bigger. [...]
[...] Robert Scoble recently wrote about a two-minute-rule for processing email. One option for dealing with email overload is to delete any email that requires more than two minutes to reply to. Bah. That’s an emotional and inappropriate reaction to a real problem. [...]
Nancy: you do realize it’s only a joke, right? It’s what we all WISH we could do, but can’t.
Nancy: you do realize it’s only a joke, right? It’s what we all WISH we could do, but can’t.
Robert: Yes, it is a joke, but there’s some shred of truth to it. At least for me personally, I sometimes have a hard time with the “can’t deal with it now” syndrome. Checking email is too convenient, but replying usually isn’t. So you end up with the piles of old email that you should be replying to, in theory. The idea that if you get an email you should take care of necessary replies immediately (or just delete it if you’re going to “leave it for later”) is a valid one.
Robert: Yes, it is a joke, but there’s some shred of truth to it. At least for me personally, I sometimes have a hard time with the “can’t deal with it now” syndrome. Checking email is too convenient, but replying usually isn’t. So you end up with the piles of old email that you should be replying to, in theory. The idea that if you get an email you should take care of necessary replies immediately (or just delete it if you’re going to “leave it for later”) is a valid one.
No, I think this is right on and maybe not a joke after all. It wouldn’t hurt to treat any email that takes more than 2 minutes to reply to as an opportunity to call or visit the person and have the discussion the old-fashioned way. That’s not always possible or practical, but prevents long-winded email threads from missing the point, straying, etc, IMHO.
No, I think this is right on and maybe not a joke after all. It wouldn’t hurt to treat any email that takes more than 2 minutes to reply to as an opportunity to call or visit the person and have the discussion the old-fashioned way. That’s not always possible or practical, but prevents long-winded email threads from missing the point, straying, etc, IMHO.
you ask the wrong question. ask “how many conversations do I have?” instead of “how many emails do I get daily?”
one conversation could equal 2 or 10 emails. gosh, &you wrote a book about it??
you ask the wrong question. ask “how many conversations do I have?” instead of “how many emails do I get daily?”
one conversation could equal 2 or 10 emails. gosh, &you wrote a book about it??
That’s why now you answer one line emails only?
At least you answer now!
That’s why now you answer one line emails only?
At least you answer now!
Robert- Joke? Nah. Wishful thinking, though. Wishful, wrong-headed thinking.
Robert- Joke? Nah. Wishful thinking, though. Wishful, wrong-headed thinking.
I’ve got 1,000 emails on an old account. I’ll need a quick way to delete and delete emails without opening emails.
I’ve got 1,000 emails on an old account. I’ll need a quick way to delete and delete emails without opening emails.
Email makes communicating easier! Right?
Email is supposed to make communication more efficient. Yeah right! Most people don’t know how to use email effectively and the result is multiple time consuming emails being sent to clarify what would have been communicated in 15 seconds on the …
Robert Scoble mentions a two minute email rule, from Eric Mack. I think that’s a bad rule that only treats symptoms.
Robert Scoble mentions a two minute email rule, from Eric Mack. I think that’s a bad rule that only treats symptoms.