Dare Obasanjo is asking “what is social media?” Frank Shaw (he’s a VP with Waggener Edstrom and is one of the key people helping Microsoft out with its PR) admits he isn’t comfortable with the “social media” term too.
The best way to understand a new media is to compare it to what’s come before? So, what kind of media do you have lying around your house? Probably these:
- Newspapers.
- Magazines.
- Television.
- Radio.
- Books.
- CDs.
- DVDs.
- A box of photos.
- Physical, paper mail and catalogs.
- Yellow Pages.
Now, what about the media (my blog) you’re reading right now? What are some attributes of it that are different than any of the “old media” above?
- The media above can’t be changed. A newspaper can’t magically change its stories, even if society decides something in them is incorrect. My blog can be updated for all readers nearly instantly if someone demonstrates that I was wrong on a post.
- You can interact with my blog. You can leave a comment. Call me an arsehole. Etc. Etc. With the above you can’t interact at all.
- You can get some sense of the popularity of my stuff in real time. How many comments does each post get? How many links does each post get? I can see in WordPress how much traffic each item gets. You can visit Digg to see voting on my blog’s items. Or, TechMeme to see which blog items got most links in the past few hours. None of the media above do you have a clue about the granular popularity of any of the items until much later after best seller lists are published.
- With the “new media” you can look at my archives and see all posts. Try doing that with a newspaper. Yeah, you can, if you pay the San Jose Mercury News a fee. But it’s not as easy as it is here.
- Here on my blog I can mix media. A post could contain text, audio, video, or photos. Not so on newspaper or magazines.
- Here on my blog I don’t need to convince a committee to publish. Not true with other media forms. Imagine you walked into CNN and said “hey, I have some cool video, can you publish it?”
- The new media is infinite. The media above all has limitations in terms of either length (a TV station only has 24 hours in a day — over on YouTube, I guarantee they publish a lot more than 24 hours of video in a day) or in quantity (try to convince USA Today to publish a 40,000 word article, or, 500 articles on the same topic).
- The new media is syndicatable and linkable and easily reused. I can link to your media here, for instance, a few seconds after you publish it. Try doing THAT with any of the above media. Not to mention, my words here kick into an RSS feed which you can then republish using something like Google Reader, if you’d like, or you can copy a sentence out of my post, paste it into your own blog, and say something about what I just said.
- The new media can be mashed up with data from other services. Check out that Amazon advertisement over to the right. Did you realize that isn’t on my, or WordPress.com’s, servers? It actually gets served up from some organization I don’t control. Amazon could, if it wanted to, replace the image there with a different book. Or, something else. Many people are putting widgets on their blogs that display various things from places they don’t control. That’s impossible in the older media above.
When I say “social media” or “new media” I’m talking about Internet media that has the ability to interact with it in some way. IE, not a press release like over on PR Newswire, but something like what we did over on Channel 9 where you could say “Microsoft sucks” right underneath one of my videos.
I don’t really care what you call this “new media” but you’ve got to admit that something different is happening here than happens on other media above.
Any other ways that “social media” is different from the older media above?
Maybe we should call it “Media 2.0?” After all, I’m a new member of the Media 2.0 Workgroup (the feed there rocks, by the way).
Social media is a must if you own a business. It forms true sound relationships and reputation that are valid and reliable sources. If you have become a target for any resaon of unfaor negative publicity then these relatiopnships will prove essential because they will know you and your ethics in business not just something that mindless or malicious people have chosen to write without validity. Bullie Pups R Us owner.
[...] http://scobleizer.com/2007/02/16/what-is-social-media/ [...]
[...] exciting to have the opportunity through ReadyTalk to become a participant in the big wide world of social media and I’m looking forward to figuring out what the heck that actually means, one of these [...]
Bullie Pups R Us says where would samll businesses be without the social media? We thrive on it!
Bullie Pups R Us says where would samll businesses be without the social media? We thrive on it!
Bullie Pups R Us says where would samll businesses be without the social media? We thrive on it!
Mr. Hurd,
Unfortunately while we value human relationships our society has been lacerated from them. We instead fill our intersubjective void with consumption.
(duh) welcome to 1955…
“social” media will thus fall into the same simulacral logic as other forms of media have.
Media is coloured by the specific character of the mode of production in which is has been produced.
Basically, don’t put all your eggs in the social media basket because until we create a much more meaningfully intersubjective society that is less alienated and more self-actualized we’re fucked no matter what the potential of a technology or a method of communication can potentially offer.
Mr. Hurd,
Unfortunately while we value human relationships our society has been lacerated from them. We instead fill our intersubjective void with consumption.
(duh) welcome to 1955…
“social” media will thus fall into the same simulacral logic as other forms of media have.
Media is coloured by the specific character of the mode of production in which is has been produced.
Basically, don’t put all your eggs in the social media basket because until we create a much more meaningfully intersubjective society that is less alienated and more self-actualized we’re fucked no matter what the potential of a technology or a method of communication can potentially offer.
Mr. Hurd,
Unfortunately while we value human relationships our society has been lacerated from them. We instead fill our intersubjective void with consumption.
(duh) welcome to 1955…
“social” media will thus fall into the same simulacral logic as other forms of media have.
Media is coloured by the specific character of the mode of production in which is has been produced.
Basically, don’t put all your eggs in the social media basket because until we create a much more meaningfully intersubjective society that is less alienated and more self-actualized we’re fucked no matter what the potential of a technology or a method of communication can potentially offer.
[...] to search around the web and found a couple of answers (Wikipedia, Stowe Boyd, Jeremiah Owyang, Robert Scoble and many others.) but this one from Chris Heuer is the one I think explains it better: Social Media [...]
[...] Robert Scoble compares it with traditional media. [When I say “social media” or “new media” I’m talking about Internet media that has the ability to interact with it in some way. IE, not a press release like over on PR Newswire, but something like what we did over on Channel 9 where you could say “Microsoft sucks” right underneath one of my videos.] [...]
[...] Scoble weighs in [...]
[...] even get a whiff of what’s goin’ on. (um, Neopets, anyone?) Many parents are still at the ‘What is social media?’ stage, much less having any hint of awareness of data-mining kids’ behavioral patterns and online [...]
[...] What is social media? « Scobleizer — Tech geek blogger (tags: web2.0 socialmedia pr2.0 media smp whatissocialmedia socialcomputing SocialSoftware) [...]
[...] Robert Scoble hat vor etwa einem Jahr eine Neun-Punkte-Liste für die Definition des Begriffs zur Diskussion gestellt. Seiner Meinung lassen sich soziale Medien wie folgt [...]
[...] the meeting was organized, hosted, and attended by “the man” Perhaps a good example of social media working too [...]
[...] a definition of social media that really hits the mark out there yet. Robert Scoble started a big discussion about the term over a year ago. That post has over 100 comments with all kinds of opinions on the [...]
[...] Zu recht treffenden Definitionsversuchen gelangt Robert Scoble, welcher vor einiger Zeit eine Neun-Punkte-Liste für die Definition des Begriffs ”Social Media” entworfen hat. Die entsprechende [...]
Hey there,
can anybody define the difference between the two abstract terms “Social Media” and “Social Software”? It seems to be quite controversial, since both the terms describe simply one thing, don’t they? Software = Media ? What is exactly meant?
Hey there,
can anybody define the difference between the two abstract terms “Social Media” and “Social Software”? It seems to be quite controversial, since both the terms describe simply one thing, don’t they? Software = Media ? What is exactly meant?
Hey there,
can anybody define the difference between the two abstract terms “Social Media” and “Social Software”? It seems to be quite controversial, since both the terms describe simply one thing, don’t they? Software = Media ? What is exactly meant?
Those definitions are not always so important.
Those definitions are not always so important.
Those definitions are not always so important.
[...] in part to Scoble we know that Social Media is [...]
[...] sites (but for Delicious, which is more about bookmarking only). They all fall under the social media [...]
[...] What is Social Media? [...]
[...] social media [...]
[...] of all, I know we’ve all heard the term thrown around, but what exactly is Social Media? Scobleizer defines the main difference between new media and old media (television, newspaper, etc.) as the [...]
[...] in part to Scoble we know that Social Media is [...]
[...] 3-5 years ago, World was unaware about such terms as Social Media, new media, Web 2.0, SMO, Blogs, Vlogs, Podcast, Micro Blogging service, Social Bookmarking, Social [...]
[...] More reading on this: http://www.socialmediaclub.org/2007/02/28/what-is-social-media-no-really-wtf http://scobleizer.com/2007/02/16/what-is-social-media http://blog.experiencecurve.com/archives/what-is-social-media […] 57. Welcome to Blogville » [...]
[...] What Is Social Media (Scobleizer) [...]
[...] a town that is famous for ice cream. For another stab at the same topic, read Robert Scoble’s What is Social Media?. More Tips Like This One: Online Publishing, Web [...]
[...] Robert Scoble says, “Compare it to what’s come before.” [...]
[...] media that has the ability to interact with it in some way.” – Robert Scoble, Feb. [...]
[...] Robert Scoble [...]
[...] Robert Scoble: “… Internet media that has the ability to interact with it in some way” [...]
[...] As pointed out by Shannon Paul (@shannonpaul), who works in New Media communications with the Detroit Red Wings where she is the contributing editor for the organization’s Hockeytown Blog, via scobleizer.com: [...]
[...] have a fundamental understanding of what exactly media is. It might shock you to hear this, but a newspaper and a blog are not media. A television and a Twitter account, are not media either. So if you’ve had had trouble [...]
I know this is off topic, but I just compiled nearly 50 interviews with the top SVPs and founders of the major social media companies worldwide; Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, MySpace, etc. for my new book, The Social Media Bible published by John Wiley & Sons. http:www.TheSocialMediaBible.com/download/ They are 30+/- minute podcasts about how each technology is being used for business. I found it really interesting to hear how people and businesses are using these tools directly from the source. The book is due out April 20th.
Lon Safko
I know this is off topic, but I just compiled nearly 50 interviews with the top SVPs and founders of the major social media companies worldwide; Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, MySpace, etc. for my new book, The Social Media Bible published by John Wiley & Sons. http:www.TheSocialMediaBible.com/download/ They are 30+/- minute podcasts about how each technology is being used for business. I found it really interesting to hear how people and businesses are using these tools directly from the source. The book is due out April 20th.
Lon Safko
I know this is off topic, but I just compiled nearly 50 interviews with the top SVPs and founders of the major social media companies worldwide; Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, MySpace, etc. for my new book, The Social Media Bible published by John Wiley & Sons. http:www.TheSocialMediaBible.com/download/ They are 30+/- minute podcasts about how each technology is being used for business. I found it really interesting to hear how people and businesses are using these tools directly from the source. The book is due out April 20th.
Lon Safko
[...] Robert Scoble’s thoughts on What is Social Media [...]
[...] has this definition. Scobleizer wrote a great blog post about what social media is. But what does all this mean simply? Social media is the usage of technology to connect people [...]
Hi, I just finished transcribing all the interviews for The Social Media Bible (www.TheSocialMediaBible.com). I was hired virtually by the author. I only mention this as a testament to the power of social media, or as I like to call it, Social Media ².
I urge all to go to and listen to these nearly 50 interviews with the top SVP’s and founders of the major social media companies world wide, Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, MySpace, etc. They are 30+/- minute podcasts about how each social media technology is being used for business.
Hi, I just finished transcribing all the interviews for The Social Media Bible (www.TheSocialMediaBible.com). I was hired virtually by the author. I only mention this as a testament to the power of social media, or as I like to call it, Social Media ².
I urge all to go to and listen to these nearly 50 interviews with the top SVP’s and founders of the major social media companies world wide, Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, MySpace, etc. They are 30+/- minute podcasts about how each social media technology is being used for business.
Hi, I just finished transcribing all the interviews for The Social Media Bible (www.TheSocialMediaBible.com). I was hired virtually by the author. I only mention this as a testament to the power of social media, or as I like to call it, Social Media ².
I urge all to go to and listen to these nearly 50 interviews with the top SVP’s and founders of the major social media companies world wide, Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, MySpace, etc. They are 30+/- minute podcasts about how each social media technology is being used for business.
[...] to Robert Scoble, one of the top bloggers (and representative of Microsoft) talking about social media back in 2007: “When I say “social media” or “new media” I’m talking about [...]
[...] about Web2.0 and social media. And isn’t the blogosphere hot about it at the moment? We have Scoble trying to define it off the back of Dare Obasanjo asking about it. There’s Stowe Boyd jumping in and trying to [...]