<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawyers at Skype bring negative PR to Skype</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/28/lawyers-at-skype-bring-negative-pr-to-skype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/28/lawyers-at-skype-bring-negative-pr-to-skype/</link>
	<description>Exploring the 2010 Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:33:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jangeirnaert</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/28/lawyers-at-skype-bring-negative-pr-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-120580</link>
		<dc:creator>jangeirnaert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/28/lawyers-at-skype-bring-negative-pr-to-skype/#comment-120580</guid>
		<description>looking back - now q4 2009 - it i decided to delete the whole blog and scrap &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skype-gadgets.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.skype-gadgets.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skype-watch.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.skype-watch.com&lt;/a&gt;. they can have it.... i think i have said anything on the matter i could. it was fun while it lasted, also a nice blog experiment that got a bit out of hand :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looking back &#8211; now q4 2009 &#8211; it i decided to delete the whole blog and scrap <a href="http://www.skype-gadgets.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.skype-gadgets.com</a>, <a href="http://www.skype-watch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.skype-watch.com</a>. they can have it&#8230;. i think i have said anything on the matter i could. it was fun while it lasted, also a nice blog experiment that got a bit out of hand <img src='http://scobleizer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloggers Comment on Alpha Blogger Post : voiceontheweb.biz</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/28/lawyers-at-skype-bring-negative-pr-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-66377</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggers Comment on Alpha Blogger Post : voiceontheweb.biz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/28/lawyers-at-skype-bring-negative-pr-to-skype/#comment-66377</guid>
		<description>[...] effect?  Not really.  Expected reaction? For sure! In fact, it was more like a slap on the hand than a &quot;heavy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] effect?  Not really.  Expected reaction? For sure! In fact, it was more like a slap on the hand than a &quot;heavy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ComBOTS-Kontroverse &#171; Sebastian&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/28/lawyers-at-skype-bring-negative-pr-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-66376</link>
		<dc:creator>ComBOTS-Kontroverse &#171; Sebastian&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/28/lawyers-at-skype-bring-negative-pr-to-skype/#comment-66376</guid>
		<description>[...] Eine Firma, die einen Blogger abmahnt (auch wenn ohne finanziellen Streitwert), weil er den Chef kritisiert, braucht wirklich nicht erwarten, dass sie von Bloggern noch gelobt wird. Firmen werden ja sogar kritisiert, wenn sie zu recht einen Blogger abmahnen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eine Firma, die einen Blogger abmahnt (auch wenn ohne finanziellen Streitwert), weil er den Chef kritisiert, braucht wirklich nicht erwarten, dass sie von Bloggern noch gelobt wird. Firmen werden ja sogar kritisiert, wenn sie zu recht einen Blogger abmahnen. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disruptive Conversations</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/28/lawyers-at-skype-bring-negative-pr-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-66355</link>
		<dc:creator>Disruptive Conversations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 16:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/28/lawyers-at-skype-bring-negative-pr-to-skype/#comment-66355</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jan stops using his Skype blog domains after Skype Legal notes he can&#039;t use Skype brand for promotional purposes (chopsticks)&lt;/strong&gt;

The news in the VoIP part of theblogosphere over the weekend was that Jan Geirnaert was shutting down www.skype-watch.com and www.skype-gadgets.com blogs. Well, to be more precise, he was stopping the use of those two domains. His weblog continues, just</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jan stops using his Skype blog domains after Skype Legal notes he can&#8217;t use Skype brand for promotional purposes (chopsticks)</strong></p>
<p>The news in the VoIP part of theblogosphere over the weekend was that Jan Geirnaert was shutting down <a href="http://www.skype-watch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.skype-watch.com</a> and <a href="http://www.skype-gadgets.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.skype-gadgets.com</a> blogs. Well, to be more precise, he was stopping the use of those two domains. His weblog continues, just</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who needs google &#183; Technology News RSS Feed - Web 2.0 News And Reviews</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/28/lawyers-at-skype-bring-negative-pr-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-66356</link>
		<dc:creator>Who needs google &#183; Technology News RSS Feed - Web 2.0 News And Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/28/lawyers-at-skype-bring-negative-pr-to-skype/#comment-66356</guid>
		<description>[...] Lawyers at Skype bring negative PR to Skype [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lawyers at Skype bring negative PR to Skype [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raincoaster</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/28/lawyers-at-skype-bring-negative-pr-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-66373</link>
		<dc:creator>raincoaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/2007/04/28/lawyers-at-skype-bring-negative-pr-to-skype/#comment-66373</guid>
		<description>The right to satirize is enshrined in US law, but a fat lot of good that&#039;ll do you in a British court. Personally, I think that co-opting bloggers is a far smarter move than steamrollering them (&quot;nice blog, here&#039;s your free t-shirt, keep in touch&quot; vs C&amp;D letter).

So, are they going to write C&amp;D&#039;s to everyone who has &quot;Skype me&quot; in their sidebar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The right to satirize is enshrined in US law, but a fat lot of good that&#8217;ll do you in a British court. Personally, I think that co-opting bloggers is a far smarter move than steamrollering them (&#8221;nice blog, here&#8217;s your free t-shirt, keep in touch&#8221; vs C&amp;D letter).</p>
<p>So, are they going to write C&amp;D&#8217;s to everyone who has &#8220;Skype me&#8221; in their sidebar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
