Um, why are they stopping at javascript?
Why not install a lightweight PHP interpreter in the browser module?
Why limit it to javascript API and static pages?
Put a PHP interpreter right in the browser!
That way you can put most of the dynamicism of a website offline.
If I wasn’t managing employees everyday, and working on a next gen SQL server, I’d throw my hat in the ring. I love PHP. Offline AJAX with JS just still doesn’t cut it. Sorry.
Otherwise, why not just use httrack. Maybe you threw a little API in there, but come on. Billions of dollars, and they won’t do client side interpreters for PHP. Zend won’t do it.
Um, why are they stopping at javascript?
Why not install a lightweight PHP interpreter in the browser module?
Why limit it to javascript API and static pages?
Put a PHP interpreter right in the browser!
That way you can put most of the dynamicism of a website offline.
If I wasn’t managing employees everyday, and working on a next gen SQL server, I’d throw my hat in the ring. I love PHP. Offline AJAX with JS just still doesn’t cut it. Sorry.
Otherwise, why not just use httrack. Maybe you threw a little API in there, but come on. Billions of dollars, and they won’t do client side interpreters for PHP. Zend won’t do it.
[...] also just posted an update that someone else is “going offline” tomorrow. With all the talks of acquisitions lately I’m hoping that it’s salesforce.com. Now [...]
Gears is a start, but in the long run web developer will need some kind of local server that can handle web apps and automatically sync data back to the cloud when you reconnect. Last year I spoke to someone at Intel, they were thinking along the same lines (don’t know if they’re still in the game, though).
A standardized package of, say, Ruby/PHP/MySQL/Webserver would be nice to have, and on top a lightweight framework that handles installation, updates and data synchronization. The downer here is the sheer size of that runtime (my guess is over 20MB even for a stripped down installer) and configuration issues. It would rock, but it’s probably not gonna happen.
Gears is a start, but in the long run web developer will need some kind of local server that can handle web apps and automatically sync data back to the cloud when you reconnect. Last year I spoke to someone at Intel, they were thinking along the same lines (don’t know if they’re still in the game, though).
A standardized package of, say, Ruby/PHP/MySQL/Webserver would be nice to have, and on top a lightweight framework that handles installation, updates and data synchronization. The downer here is the sheer size of that runtime (my guess is over 20MB even for a stripped down installer) and configuration issues. It would rock, but it’s probably not gonna happen.
Aaaw – you can tell us – we won’t tell anyone!
Aaaw – you can tell us – we won’t tell anyone!
Why not just wait till tomorrow noon then?
Why not just wait till tomorrow noon then?
Oh how you tease us.
YouTube? Amazon?
Haha, I have no clue…
Oh how you tease us.
YouTube? Amazon?
Haha, I have no clue…
Anon: because otherwise you wouldn’t know to be back here at noon, would you?
Anon: because otherwise you wouldn’t know to be back here at noon, would you?
Um, why are they stopping at javascript?
Why not install a lightweight PHP interpreter in the browser module?
Why limit it to javascript API and static pages?
Put a PHP interpreter right in the browser!
That way you can put most of the dynamicism of a website offline.
If I wasn’t managing employees everyday, and working on a next gen SQL server, I’d throw my hat in the ring. I love PHP. Offline AJAX with JS just still doesn’t cut it. Sorry.
http://www.httrack.com/
http://spiderzilla.mozdev.org/
Otherwise, why not just use httrack. Maybe you threw a little API in there, but come on. Billions of dollars, and they won’t do client side interpreters for PHP. Zend won’t do it.
Um, why are they stopping at javascript?
Why not install a lightweight PHP interpreter in the browser module?
Why limit it to javascript API and static pages?
Put a PHP interpreter right in the browser!
That way you can put most of the dynamicism of a website offline.
If I wasn’t managing employees everyday, and working on a next gen SQL server, I’d throw my hat in the ring. I love PHP. Offline AJAX with JS just still doesn’t cut it. Sorry.
http://www.httrack.com/
http://spiderzilla.mozdev.org/
Otherwise, why not just use httrack. Maybe you threw a little API in there, but come on. Billions of dollars, and they won’t do client side interpreters for PHP. Zend won’t do it.
Popfly?
Adobe Apollo?
But the PHP interpreter in a browser would be great. I vote for Chris’s idea.
Popfly?
Adobe Apollo?
But the PHP interpreter in a browser would be great. I vote for Chris’s idea.
Robert: My, my, aren’t you full of tasty tidbits of knowledge today….
Robert: My, my, aren’t you full of tasty tidbits of knowledge today….
Mozilla?
http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz/2007/02/offline-zimbra-with-firefox.html
Mozilla?
http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz/2007/02/offline-zimbra-with-firefox.html
With all the talk about acquisitions, my bets are on salesforce.com – now that would be exciting!
With all the talk about acquisitions, my bets are on salesforce.com – now that would be exciting!
[...] also just posted an update that someone else is “going offline” tomorrow. With all the talks of acquisitions lately I’m hoping that it’s salesforce.com. Now [...]
Zoho or Adobe
Zoho or Adobe
“because otherwise you wouldn’t know to be back here at noon, would you?”
Er, there’s this marvellous new invention, I don’t know if you’ve heard of it…what’s it called…oh yes, RSS, that’s it.
Seriously this is the dumbest post of the week
“I’ll be posting something cool tomorrow so be sure to come back!”
“Uh, won’t it be in my RSS reader?”
“Well, yeah, I *guess* you could do that…”
“because otherwise you wouldn’t know to be back here at noon, would you?”
Er, there’s this marvellous new invention, I don’t know if you’ve heard of it…what’s it called…oh yes, RSS, that’s it.
Seriously this is the dumbest post of the week
“I’ll be posting something cool tomorrow so be sure to come back!”
“Uh, won’t it be in my RSS reader?”
“Well, yeah, I *guess* you could do that…”
Gears is a start, but in the long run web developer will need some kind of local server that can handle web apps and automatically sync data back to the cloud when you reconnect. Last year I spoke to someone at Intel, they were thinking along the same lines (don’t know if they’re still in the game, though).
A standardized package of, say, Ruby/PHP/MySQL/Webserver would be nice to have, and on top a lightweight framework that handles installation, updates and data synchronization. The downer here is the sheer size of that runtime (my guess is over 20MB even for a stripped down installer) and configuration issues. It would rock, but it’s probably not gonna happen.
Gears is a start, but in the long run web developer will need some kind of local server that can handle web apps and automatically sync data back to the cloud when you reconnect. Last year I spoke to someone at Intel, they were thinking along the same lines (don’t know if they’re still in the game, though).
A standardized package of, say, Ruby/PHP/MySQL/Webserver would be nice to have, and on top a lightweight framework that handles installation, updates and data synchronization. The downer here is the sheer size of that runtime (my guess is over 20MB even for a stripped down installer) and configuration issues. It would rock, but it’s probably not gonna happen.
My bet is on Bloglines…
My bet is on Bloglines…
It has to be Microsoft, right? I mean, usually when a company announces something new you have Microsoft announcing the same thing the following day.
It has to be Microsoft, right? I mean, usually when a company announces something new you have Microsoft announcing the same thing the following day.
So, now it’s saturday (at least in Europe) so tell us!
So, now it’s saturday (at least in Europe) so tell us!