Facebook traffic down?

by on October 11, 2007

Wow, Facebook’s traffic is going down? Hey, Facebook. I’d love to have you come on my show to refute these charges!

Honestly, though? I’ve been spending a lot less time there. Why? Cause I can’t add any more friends and it pisses me off. I’ve been spending a lot more time with my new son and over on Twitter.

UPDATE: Andy Beal says same thing happened last year and then the traffic went back up.

{ 2 trackbacks }

Web Community Forum » Blog Archive » Facebook stats dip? Oh noes!
10.11.07 at 11:45 am
Ryan Stewart - Rich Internet Application Mountaineer
10.11.07 at 1:32 pm

{ 19 comments }

Ben Tamblyn 10.11.07 at 11:19 am

He He – Maybe Twitter will end up buying FB !!!!! This might not make it on Truemors.

Eshwar 10.11.07 at 11:25 am

Seriously are you desperate to get people on your show or something. First you wanted Zune folks to refute your biased charges against them. Now you want Facebook people to do something similar. Seriously what help does it do to them if they come on their show. If traffic is high its high, if its low its low. Coming on your show will have zero effect on it. Also very very few people would even have that much contacts on their account.

Robert Scoble 10.11.07 at 11:30 am

Eshwar: I have a new person or company on my show every day. In the past year I’ve had about 300 on. I want people who are making news on my show. Facebook is definitely making news and I’d expect they’d want to refute these claims, if they are incorrect. If their traffic is really dropping then that’ll hit their valuations and the amount that they’ll be able to get from investors. Doing that refutation on a show that has a lot of viewers is what I’d do, if I worked in PR there.

Tim Dawson 10.11.07 at 11:48 am

Grow up. “Let me add more friends or I’ll publicly announce I’ve stopped using you!”

I’m glad Facebook treat you just the same as everybody else. You don’t have 5000 friends, and neither does anyone else on the planet.

Michael Bailey 10.11.07 at 11:51 am

Well, perhaps they cannot refute it because it simply is true.

Sometimes, the only reason something gets popular is because it is trendy, and that trend is destroyed if it becomes the place where suddenly everyone is at.

Do you think that having a dial-tone in your house is cool? Of course not, but once upon a time, not everyone had a telephone.

Hell, the iPhone is just a repeat of that same behavior. I guess human behavior hasn’t really changed that much in the last 100 years.

Robert Scoble 10.11.07 at 12:30 pm

Tim: Facebook doesn’t claim to be a “friends network.” They claim to be a “social utility.” I do have 5552 people in my social network. Just because you don’t doesn’t mean I don’t.

I’ve also collected more than 4,000 business cards in the past seven years. Are you saying these people don’t deserve to be in my rolodex?

Mark Stultz 10.11.07 at 12:37 pm

It’s due to the massive traffic from http://www.apple.com/webapps/
;)

PXLated 10.11.07 at 12:53 pm

“I’ve been spending a lot more time with my new son”
Real life interceeds…Now that is being social…and isn’t it much better than all you could do was write on his wall or Tweet him? :-)

Joe 10.11.07 at 12:58 pm

@6 “Sometimes, the only reason something gets popular is because it is trendy, and that trend is destroyed if it becomes the place where suddenly everyone is at.”

Or to quote Yogi Berra: “Nobody goes there any more, it’s too crowded!”

Reb Yudel 10.11.07 at 2:39 pm

But Robert: What happens when your son grows up… and refuses to let you be his facebook friend?

When I finally joined Facebook, I signed up as part of the regional group… and had access to the profile of my college freshman daughter. It was interesting… and at least a little bit icky. I don’t really want to be reading her diary, and that’s sort of what reading her Facebook page was about.

So will Facebook start sorting out friends? Those we tell everything to, those we tell impersonal achievements to, those we share disgraceful jokes with?

Zac Echola 10.11.07 at 2:54 pm

I hope you’re spending more time with your son because he’s your son and not actually because you can’t add more people to Facebook.
:)

Anatoly Lubarsky 10.11.07 at 3:31 pm

Robert, why don’t you tell that Facebook is irresponsible regarding their platform, they have lots of breaking changes, arrogant and don’t care about apps using their platform.

They don’t admit bugs and their tech quality is low.

Anatoly Lubarsky 10.11.07 at 3:32 pm

you can watch out Facebook development discussion board these days.

Tim Dawson 10.12.07 at 4:54 am

Robert, yes, it’s a social utility. Not a rolodex. It’s not supposed to be a repository of everyone you’ve ever met, every “fan” who wants to be your “friend”. It’s not a substitute for a collection of business cards. It’s for people you actually socialize with, be it online or off.

It’s for friends to keep in contact with each other and keep up-to-date with what they’re doing.

Jeff Putz 10.12.07 at 7:32 am

If you haven’t looked at Om Malik’s post on the subject, he indicated it’s because the ratings panel method is largely home based, and the kids all went back to their colleges.

Get the deeper story, eh?

Robert Scoble 10.12.07 at 8:29 am

Tim: you’re wrong. But, that’s OK.

I talk with thousands of people. For me to be a real utility it must allow me to talk with who I want. I also use it like a phone book, looking up people and talking with them via email, phone, or Facebook’s messaging system. That’s what a utility is.

Tim Dawson 10.12.07 at 9:46 am

I know you talk with thousands of people. That’s what you do.

Your last statement made no sense. “That’s what a utility is?” Something that lets you use it as a phone book, email, phone? I don’t understand.

It sounds like you’re trying to use Facebook in a way in which it wasn’t really meant to be used, and then complaining that it isn’t flexible enough. That’s an unreasonable thing to do. Especially when your method of coping with that is complaining to a large audience and making vague threats to stop using it.

Robert Scoble 10.12.07 at 9:58 am

Tim: are you a Facebook engineer? I know several. They want it to be used like a Rolodex. I’ve interviewed Facebook’s founders and engineers. You haven’t. So how the hell do you know how they meant it to be used?

The reason there is a 5,000 limit is because Facebook has a scaling problem. Their systems get slower and slower because of all the database joins that it needs to do.

Merlin Ward 10.12.07 at 12:14 pm

There is a lot of competition in the social network space. Especially in the recent years, which may have limited the growth of Facebook.

This also only shows unique visitors, which isn’t clearly defined in the article (despite that it may be common knowledge, they could be using it differently). In consideration, Facebook may have become too complex for new members to join, who would rather go back to simple ol’ Myspace.

The article states that this drop was before the “back to school” season. There was as similar drop back in Jan-Feb. Also before the season. Hmmm, is it possible that Facebook traffic has cycles? In addition to that argument Myspace is a different company with a different brand in the same space, which may not have cycles at all.

Comments on this entry are closed.