Comments on: Why Vista isn’t as good as the Mac

By: Henry

Henry — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:37:06 +0000

I feel that the steam in 'Mac is superior to PC/Vista' is swooshing out. Look at the 'Why Mac' on Apple website - the only main point seems to be - 'Mac already had what Vista has now'. So what? Where are the softwares for Mac?
CPAP machine

By: Henry

Henry — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:37:06 +0000

I feel that the steam in 'Mac is superior to PC/Vista' is swooshing out. Look at the 'Why Mac' on Apple website – the only main point seems to be – 'Mac already had what Vista has now'. So what? Where are the softwares for Mac?

By: gmail

gmail — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:31:35 +0000

vista is good

By: gmail

gmail — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:31:00 +0000

vista is good

By: Bob Hall

Bob Hall — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:12:29 +0000

What I don’t like about Mac users is that they are not “users.” They are members of the Mac Cult. Mac “users” are emotionally attached to their machine, their software, and the other Mac cult members. Steve Jobs knows this, which is why he treats his cult members so badly by making all his new computers incompatible with his old ones. Mac cult members accept this obvious marketing ploy as the price for having “the latest and the best.” There is no question that Mac software is really cool, but that comes with a high price. Mac users claim to be less “geeky,” less interested in technical stuff. That may be true, but it proves just how expensive ignorance can be. The truth, I suspect, is that Mac users are just as involved with their software as most Windows users. It is true that Windows is less stable than the Mac OS, but usually the instability comes from using something from the vast array of options available to PC users, options unavailable to Mac users. For me, a former Mac Addict, backwards compatibility, much lower prices, and the flexibility of the PC far outweight the price I have had to pay with “instability.”

By: Bob Hall

Bob Hall — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:12:00 +0000