<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Microsoft Live Mesh will fail with early adopters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/01/why-microsoft-live-mesh-will-fail-with-early-adopters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/01/why-microsoft-live-mesh-will-fail-with-early-adopters/</link>
	<description>Exploring the 2010 Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:44:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WinExtra &#187; Breaking down the Mesh</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/01/why-microsoft-live-mesh-will-fail-with-early-adopters/comment-page-1/#comment-99528</link>
		<dc:creator>WinExtra &#187; Breaking down the Mesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 20:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/?p=4209#comment-99528</guid>
		<description>[...] The idea of the Technical Preview was primarily to let the world know that Microsoft has something very serious in the works and that they shouldn&#8217;t be counted out just yet regardless of some people are saying. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The idea of the Technical Preview was primarily to let the world know that Microsoft has something very serious in the works and that they shouldn&#8217;t be counted out just yet regardless of some people are saying. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WinExtra &#187; From the Pipeline - 5.2.08</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/01/why-microsoft-live-mesh-will-fail-with-early-adopters/comment-page-1/#comment-99497</link>
		<dc:creator>WinExtra &#187; From the Pipeline - 5.2.08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/?p=4209#comment-99497</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Microsoft Live Mesh will fail with early adopters :: scobleizer.com - Robert doesn&#8217;t seem to have to high of an opinion of Mesh. Oh well he can&#8217;t be right all the time [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Microsoft Live Mesh will fail with early adopters :: scobleizer.com &#8211; Robert doesn&#8217;t seem to have to high of an opinion of Mesh. Oh well he can&#8217;t be right all the time [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DotMac</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/01/why-microsoft-live-mesh-will-fail-with-early-adopters/comment-page-1/#comment-99496</link>
		<dc:creator>DotMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/?p=4209#comment-99496</guid>
		<description>I really wish Apple frees .Mac so everybody else knows how to do web stuff that appeals to the end user, not just the developer or geeky type.

Mesh is a failure worse than hailstorm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wish Apple frees .Mac so everybody else knows how to do web stuff that appeals to the end user, not just the developer or geeky type.</p>
<p>Mesh is a failure worse than hailstorm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/01/why-microsoft-live-mesh-will-fail-with-early-adopters/comment-page-1/#comment-99495</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 23:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/?p=4209#comment-99495</guid>
		<description>Wow... uninstalling random software to fix a flaky OS?  Sure takes me back to my Windows days.

- happy Linux user</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; uninstalling random software to fix a flaky OS?  Sure takes me back to my Windows days.</p>
<p>- happy Linux user</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maverick_NY</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/01/why-microsoft-live-mesh-will-fail-with-early-adopters/comment-page-1/#comment-99492</link>
		<dc:creator>Maverick_NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/?p=4209#comment-99492</guid>
		<description>I think many people, early adopters or not, technology savvy or not, are getting increasingly fed up and exasperated with MS&#039;s tendency to dump buggy, ill thought out and crashable software on an unsuspecting public.  Look at the Vista disaster, for example.  As an incandescent friend said recently, &quot;They hide everything, so you have to stumble over what you don’t want to get what you do want.  And then it keeps crashing.&quot;

Will Mesh be any different?  The concept might sound cool, but execution is crucial for the long running health of any business.  Fail at that too many times and people will start looking elsewhere.

Fed up with Windows and high priced Office, I switched to Apple gradually; I&#039;m not technology geek but I do like stuff that works.  Stuff like a stable OS, a search tool that looks for a word in the document (Spotlight), a phenomenal backup system (Time machine), an easy to set up wi-fi... the list goes on.  Files can be easily shared between different computers across my wi-fi network between the office and the garden, for example.  It even mirrored my old Dell&#039;s hard drive for easy copying of hundreds of old files in minutes, all without a cable.  I didn&#039;t need an instruction manual, it was intuitive and easy.  It was also very stable.

My point is, would I trust MS not to make a balls up of Mesh and offer yet another buggy, flawed and unstable software?  My experience tells me to be cynical, weary and suspicious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think many people, early adopters or not, technology savvy or not, are getting increasingly fed up and exasperated with MS&#8217;s tendency to dump buggy, ill thought out and crashable software on an unsuspecting public.  Look at the Vista disaster, for example.  As an incandescent friend said recently, &#8220;They hide everything, so you have to stumble over what you don’t want to get what you do want.  And then it keeps crashing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Will Mesh be any different?  The concept might sound cool, but execution is crucial for the long running health of any business.  Fail at that too many times and people will start looking elsewhere.</p>
<p>Fed up with Windows and high priced Office, I switched to Apple gradually; I&#8217;m not technology geek but I do like stuff that works.  Stuff like a stable OS, a search tool that looks for a word in the document (Spotlight), a phenomenal backup system (Time machine), an easy to set up wi-fi&#8230; the list goes on.  Files can be easily shared between different computers across my wi-fi network between the office and the garden, for example.  It even mirrored my old Dell&#8217;s hard drive for easy copying of hundreds of old files in minutes, all without a cable.  I didn&#8217;t need an instruction manual, it was intuitive and easy.  It was also very stable.</p>
<p>My point is, would I trust MS not to make a balls up of Mesh and offer yet another buggy, flawed and unstable software?  My experience tells me to be cynical, weary and suspicious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prokofy</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/01/why-microsoft-live-mesh-will-fail-with-early-adopters/comment-page-1/#comment-99494</link>
		<dc:creator>Prokofy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/?p=4209#comment-99494</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like Mesh because I can see at a glance that it&#039;s communist collectivism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like Mesh because I can see at a glance that it&#8217;s communist collectivism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
