Twittering the earthquake in China

BBC: Twitter and the China earthquake.

I reported the major quake to my followers on Twitter before the USGS Website had a report up and about an hour before CNN or major press started talking about it. Now there’s lots of info over on Google News.

How did I do that? Well, I was watching Twitter on Google Talk. Several people in China reported to me they felt the quake WHILE IT WAS GOING ON!!!

Over the next two hours I pointed at anyone who had info about the quake on my Twitter account.

It’s amazing the kind of news you can learn by being on Twitter and the connections you can make among people across the world.

I fear a large casualty loss. The epicenter was 50 miles from Chengdu, which has about 10.5 million residents. Already reports are coming across of buildings that have been knocked down.

dtan was the first Twitterer I saw talking about the quake. This was my first post in reaction to him.

UPDATE: Online Journalism Blog has a lot more details about what happened on Twitter tonight. From the Frontline blog has even more.

UPDATE2: Global Voices Online has links to videos and other Twitter and blog reports.

UPDATE3: here’s a timeline of what first Tweets looked like.

  • Benjol

    Here’s a little bit of communications heresy for you guys who seem to get high on the stuff:

    Does it matter?
    Not that there was an earthquake, but that you should know about it faster than anyone else.
    What difference does it make?
    For you, and (more importantly) for the people affected.

    I suspect that being constantly bombarded with news about which we can do nothing just makes us more apathetic – even for the things about which we *could* do something.

  • Benjol

    Here’s a little bit of communications heresy for you guys who seem to get high on the stuff:

    Does it matter?
    Not that there was an earthquake, but that you should know about it faster than anyone else.
    What difference does it make?
    For you, and (more importantly) for the people affected.

    I suspect that being constantly bombarded with news about which we can do nothing just makes us more apathetic – even for the things about which we *could* do something.

  • http://www.genomed.com/ David Moskowitz MD MA(Oxon.) F

    If anybody is near the quake, perhaps you could do me a favor.

    One of the problems that survivors now start facing is acute kidney failure–from dehydration plus crush injury (rhabdomyolysis). The treatment is i.v. hydration, which works well at least half the time.

    For the survivors whose kidneys have already failed–who have no urine output despite lots of i.v. fluids–my company has something to offer. We’ve been issued a patent for treating acute kidney failure without having to use dialysis. We use a generic medication instead, which is given i.v. It may be that oral tablets will work as well.

    I don’t know how practical this request is, but if you could somehow try to get word to those taking care of survivors of the quake to contact me at http://www.genomed.com, I’d be happy to share our “recipe” for acute kidney failure with them.

    Best regards,
    Dave Moskowitz MD
    CEO & Chief Medical Officer
    GenoMed, Inc.
    Ticker symbol: GMED (on Pink Sheets)
    “The public health company(tm)”

  • http://www.infoservi.it/ alberto d’ottavi

    Hi Robert

    Just for the record, should this be useful, here’s my two (literally) cents about this story (in italian): http://tinyurl.com/5eam5g and http://tinyurl.com/5d6nbe

    I’m with you, thinking that Twitter has been a great newstool. I really can’t understand why so many don’t get this

    But as I said elsewhere, I think that “who’s first” is not exactly the main point: IMHO “how fast, how many” and “how open” is much more interesting. yes, the idea of a spontaneous, planetary collaboration in newsmaking it’s not so new anymore, but it’s still fascinating and I think it’s great to see it at work

  • http://www.genomed.com David Moskowitz MD MA(Oxon.) FACP

    If anybody is near the quake, perhaps you could do me a favor.

    One of the problems that survivors now start facing is acute kidney failure–from dehydration plus crush injury (rhabdomyolysis). The treatment is i.v. hydration, which works well at least half the time.

    For the survivors whose kidneys have already failed–who have no urine output despite lots of i.v. fluids–my company has something to offer. We’ve been issued a patent for treating acute kidney failure without having to use dialysis. We use a generic medication instead, which is given i.v. It may be that oral tablets will work as well.

    I don’t know how practical this request is, but if you could somehow try to get word to those taking care of survivors of the quake to contact me at http://www.genomed.com, I’d be happy to share our “recipe” for acute kidney failure with them.

    Best regards,
    Dave Moskowitz MD
    CEO & Chief Medical Officer
    GenoMed, Inc.
    Ticker symbol: GMED (on Pink Sheets)
    “The public health company(tm)”

  • http://www.infoservi.it alberto d’ottavi

    Hi Robert

    Just for the record, should this be useful, here’s my two (literally) cents about this story (in italian): http://tinyurl.com/5eam5g and http://tinyurl.com/5d6nbe

    I’m with you, thinking that Twitter has been a great newstool. I really can’t understand why so many don’t get this

    But as I said elsewhere, I think that “who’s first” is not exactly the main point: IMHO “how fast, how many” and “how open” is much more interesting. yes, the idea of a spontaneous, planetary collaboration in newsmaking it’s not so new anymore, but it’s still fascinating and I think it’s great to see it at work

  • Pingback: Eating Cacti For Breakfast! » Blog Archive » China’s earthquake on Twitter

  • http://www.javaunmoradi.com/ Javaun

    Brian, I love your posts and usually agree with you, but I think this goes too far in praising the speed with which a Tweet travels while not examining the quality, accuracy, and above all the value of the message.

    First, I’m sure someone phoned someone at some point to report the quake. Before we talk about Twitter beating USGS, we might want to talk about how valuable Twitter is versus a phone — or yelling.

    The quake probably did end up as a tweet before USGS got it. In addition to being a bureaucratic agency, USGS has to confirm and make sense of what it reports. It has a reputation and can’t go willy-nilly throwing out 140 character outbursts without doing due-diligence. It doesn’t surprise me that the twittersphere was alive with posts. But how valuable are those posts really? I’m guessing most of the posts were “OMG something is happening…” Even if you had anything valuable to share, you only had 140 characters, so good luck being articulate. There’s nothing actionable there, and any officials paying attention to the wrong people might miss some valuable, life-saving information. That’s not even touching the argument that Twitter is so cluttered and fragmented that anything potentially valuable is going to be buried; anytime something actually happens, Twitter turns into the online version of a mass-panic, so you’ll have even more tweets by people who also don’t know what’s going on. In that way, the lack of actionable information and chaos on Twitter probably ressembled the street-level frenzy in China.

    Twitter works well for people at the top of the pyramid like you, but you may even feel less comfortable if the service is adopted too wildly. Right now, gurus like you are the loud voices in a big auditorium with a lot of empty seats. If mass adoption takes over, the authoritative voices may get drowned out, and with that the utility of the tool as a great connector may diminish.

    I’ve been spending less and less time on Twitter and can say I’m better for it. It’s a great tool for people who can afford to spend all day on it, and I’m glad some of you can and report on your dialogues, but I can’t (if everyone spent all day on it, our world would grind to a halt). If something remarkable happens, I know you guys will hash it out and put the conversation together in a coherent blog post so that I don’t have to read 600 tweets to get the 2 pieces of valuable information out of it.

    I should caveat all of this by saying I’m still a big Twitter skeptic. There is a lot of fascinating interaction and communication going on in the Twitter community, and that there is an exciting future for this kind of on-everywhere short communication, I also don’t believe that Twitter is the company to take it to the next level. But that’s another conversation about technology.

  • http://www.javaunmoradi.com Javaun

    Brian, I love your posts and usually agree with you, but I think this goes too far in praising the speed with which a Tweet travels while not examining the quality, accuracy, and above all the value of the message.

    First, I’m sure someone phoned someone at some point to report the quake. Before we talk about Twitter beating USGS, we might want to talk about how valuable Twitter is versus a phone — or yelling.

    The quake probably did end up as a tweet before USGS got it. In addition to being a bureaucratic agency, USGS has to confirm and make sense of what it reports. It has a reputation and can’t go willy-nilly throwing out 140 character outbursts without doing due-diligence. It doesn’t surprise me that the twittersphere was alive with posts. But how valuable are those posts really? I’m guessing most of the posts were “OMG something is happening…” Even if you had anything valuable to share, you only had 140 characters, so good luck being articulate. There’s nothing actionable there, and any officials paying attention to the wrong people might miss some valuable, life-saving information. That’s not even touching the argument that Twitter is so cluttered and fragmented that anything potentially valuable is going to be buried; anytime something actually happens, Twitter turns into the online version of a mass-panic, so you’ll have even more tweets by people who also don’t know what’s going on. In that way, the lack of actionable information and chaos on Twitter probably ressembled the street-level frenzy in China.

    Twitter works well for people at the top of the pyramid like you, but you may even feel less comfortable if the service is adopted too wildly. Right now, gurus like you are the loud voices in a big auditorium with a lot of empty seats. If mass adoption takes over, the authoritative voices may get drowned out, and with that the utility of the tool as a great connector may diminish.

    I’ve been spending less and less time on Twitter and can say I’m better for it. It’s a great tool for people who can afford to spend all day on it, and I’m glad some of you can and report on your dialogues, but I can’t (if everyone spent all day on it, our world would grind to a halt). If something remarkable happens, I know you guys will hash it out and put the conversation together in a coherent blog post so that I don’t have to read 600 tweets to get the 2 pieces of valuable information out of it.

    I should caveat all of this by saying I’m still a big Twitter skeptic. There is a lot of fascinating interaction and communication going on in the Twitter community, and that there is an exciting future for this kind of on-everywhere short communication, I also don’t believe that Twitter is the company to take it to the next level. But that’s another conversation about technology.

  • http://phonelover.blogspot.com/ PhoneLover

    really sad when I got to know this news. over 10k ppl dead. Can’t imagine what will happen to Olympipc if this happen in beijing.

  • http://phonelover.blogspot.com/ PhoneLover

    really sad when I got to know this news. over 10k ppl dead. Can’t imagine what will happen to Olympipc if this happen in beijing.

  • Pingback: Twitter als Newsstream-Beschleuniger und was das mit Newsoverflow zu tun hat - Tobbis Blog

  • Pingback: Bloggers Rally for the Red Cross | Max Gladwell

  • Pingback: Twittering About the China Quake « Webs@Work

  • Pingback: Erdbeben in Sichuan: “Privat-Reporter” als wirksame Waffe gegen Geheimhaltung? « Mein Handy bloggt!

  • Pingback: ☆ Added Links from Twitter powered by Summize.com

  • http://luke.gedeon.name/ Luke Gedeon

    The good news China is accepting aid. Burma is not. Please write a post titled “Help Burma Now!” Here is why: Help Burma Now!

  • http://luke.gedeon.name/ Luke Gedeon

    The good news China is accepting aid. Burma is not. Please write a post titled “Help Burma Now!” Here is why: Help Burma Now!

  • Joe Jamin

    15000 people dead, 30000+ still buried alive, and all you can come up with is that you are faster than USGS by 3 minutes and CNN by an hour? No word about the people that are suffering, no link to redcross or other donation websites. Do you realize how cold and cruel this makes you look?

  • Joe Jamin

    15000 people dead, 30000+ still buried alive, and all you can come up with is that you are faster than USGS by 3 minutes and CNN by an hour? No word about the people that are suffering, no link to redcross or other donation websites. Do you realize how cold and cruel this makes you look?

  • Chinaman

    you, Robert Scoble, should better donate some of your own money (im not talking about sponsorhip money, you would raise and by that creating even more publicity for yourself and twitter) instead of abusing such a tragedy for promoting yourself and a product, that for 99,99% of humanity is completely useless. none of the tweets from western twitterers in the sichuan area reported of any casualties after the quake. the people really affected by the quake are so poor that most of them cant even afford a mobile phone, let a lone internet. it was on official media to report the actual devastating death toll numbers. you spoiled it nerds should all take a break and do something for those (all around the world) who really are in need for “innovative” (=live saving) services

  • Chinaman

    you, Robert Scoble, should better donate some of your own money (im not talking about sponsorhip money, you would raise and by that creating even more publicity for yourself and twitter) instead of abusing such a tragedy for promoting yourself and a product, that for 99,99% of humanity is completely useless. none of the tweets from western twitterers in the sichuan area reported of any casualties after the quake. the people really affected by the quake are so poor that most of them cant even afford a mobile phone, let a lone internet. it was on official media to report the actual devastating death toll numbers. you spoiled it nerds should all take a break and do something for those (all around the world) who really are in need for “innovative” (=live saving) services

  • http://scobleizer.com/ Robert Scoble

    Joe Jamin: do you realize how much of an idiot your comment makes you look? We were already talking about those things on my Twitter account. Geesh. Like there’s ANYONE in the planet who isn’t aware now that there was severe suffering in the aftermath of this quake. But two hours after the quake? We had no idea (I was even getting crap from other people for saying that there would be massive casualties).

  • http://scobleizer.com/ Robert Scoble

    Joe Jamin: do you realize how much of an idiot your comment makes you look? We were already talking about those things on my Twitter account. Geesh. Like there’s ANYONE in the planet who isn’t aware now that there was severe suffering in the aftermath of this quake. But two hours after the quake? We had no idea (I was even getting crap from other people for saying that there would be massive casualties).

  • Pingback: Geology News » Disseminating Information: Twitter vs. USGS on the Sichuan Earthquake

  • Pingback: Mainstream imminent? Twitter traffic almost doubled from February to April » VentureBeat

  • Pingback: Twitter wordt steeds populairder | Inspiratie 2.0

  • Pingback: MGH Word of Mouth » Blog Archive » Twitter Breaks News In China

  • rich

    why did so many people die in the china earth quake?

  • http://none rich

    why did so many people die in the china earth quake?

  • Pingback: Nuevos medios y China « Nuevos Medios de Comunicación, Culturas y Procesos Globales

  • Pingback: Tremblement en Chine, d’abord sur twitter? | Berious

  • Pingback: Best Photo Blog » Blog Archive » Twittering About the China Quake

  • Pingback: Twittering the earthquake… at Core Target - Bogdan Gavrila

  • Pingback: Twittering your breakfast – and the earthquake in China « Social Media

  • Pingback: Kirk Yuhnke, Reporter for Fox News 13 Joins the Conversation - My Tips for Him as a Reporter | Stay N' Alive

  • Pingback: Igor The Troll » China earthquake Twitter Robert Scoble

  • Vivek Gupta

    I am deeply saddened by the loss of life due to the earthquake in China. May their souls rest in peace. Survivors need urgent medical attention, food, clothing, shelter etc. We need to help the survivors in every possible way.

  • Vivek Gupta

    I am deeply saddened by the loss of life due to the earthquake in China. May their souls rest in peace. Survivors need urgent medical attention, food, clothing, shelter etc. We need to help the survivors in every possible way.

  • Pingback: Twitter and What Should You Tweet About?

  • Pingback: China’s Earthquake Internet Response | UsefulArts.us

  • http://chinaquake.zhan.cn.yahoo.com/ Paul Johnston

    Twitter got the story but weeping is NOT all we can do. In fact, many have already begun to take action. See www.http://chinaquake.zhan.cn.yahoo.com to learn about the nonprofit organization Chinese Earthquake Fund. This initiative, spearheaded by Shou-Ching Tang, MD, Director of Hematology/Oncology at Denver Health in Denver, CO, has been established to raise funds for medical supplies for West China Hospital in Chengdu. It is located 60 miles from the epicenter and is treating 1200 seariously injured victims, more than half need secondary surgery. You can find out how to donate money at the aforementioned website. Thanks for doing more than weeping for the victims of this devastating earthquake.

  • http://chinaquake.zhan.cn.yahoo.com Paul Johnston

    Twitter got the story but weeping is NOT all we can do. In fact, many have already begun to take action. See www.http://chinaquake.zhan.cn.yahoo.com to learn about the nonprofit organization Chinese Earthquake Fund. This initiative, spearheaded by Shou-Ching Tang, MD, Director of Hematology/Oncology at Denver Health in Denver, CO, has been established to raise funds for medical supplies for West China Hospital in Chengdu. It is located 60 miles from the epicenter and is treating 1200 seariously injured victims, more than half need secondary surgery. You can find out how to donate money at the aforementioned website. Thanks for doing more than weeping for the victims of this devastating earthquake.

  • Pingback: Twitter and the China Earthquake « Internet Marketing Blog by NoonanNight

  • http://freeessaywebsite.blogspot.com/2008/05/earthquake-facts-and-figurescauses.html kashif

    nice post for Earthquake Facts

  • http://freeessaywebsite.blogspot.com/2008/05/earthquake-facts-and-figurescauses.html kashif

    nice post for Earthquake Facts

  • Pingback: Think Twitter’s the biggest microblogging service? Take a look at SMS GupShup » VentureBeat

  • Pingback: Think Twitter’s the biggest microblogging service? | Sinlung News

  • Pingback: Putting Twitter in perspective at CIID

  • Pingback: THINK / Musings :: Summize acquired by Twitter