<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JPG&#8217;s dead. Why your advertising-funded business could be next&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scobleizer.com/2009/01/02/jpgs-dead-advertising-funded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/01/02/jpgs-dead-advertising-funded/</link>
	<description>Exploring the 2010 Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:45:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/01/02/jpgs-dead-advertising-funded/comment-page-1/#comment-119314</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 23:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=5185#comment-119314</guid>
		<description>People on &lt;a href=&quot;http://jpgmag.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;jpgmag.com&lt;/a&gt; are into photo. Its a good place to sell photo stuff.&lt;br&gt;They just got to keep innovating the site to keep people there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People on <a href="http://jpgmag.com" rel="nofollow">jpgmag.com</a> are into photo. Its a good place to sell photo stuff.<br />They just got to keep innovating the site to keep people there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magtastic Blogsplosion &#124; What happened to JPG</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/01/02/jpgs-dead-advertising-funded/comment-page-1/#comment-110295</link>
		<dc:creator>Magtastic Blogsplosion &#124; What happened to JPG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=5185#comment-110295</guid>
		<description>[...] others felt it was not aspirational enough and the cover price was too high; or maybe it just didn&#8217;t get the right distribution, appeal to advertisers or do something that Flickr didn&amp;#821...; in the end it just proved too expensive for its publisher, particularly in a troubled ad [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] others felt it was not aspirational enough and the cover price was too high; or maybe it just didn&#8217;t get the right distribution, appeal to advertisers or do something that Flickr didn&amp;#821&#8230;; in the end it just proved too expensive for its publisher, particularly in a troubled ad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Semua Ide Anda Payah! &#124; NavinoT</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/01/02/jpgs-dead-advertising-funded/comment-page-1/#comment-110273</link>
		<dc:creator>Semua Ide Anda Payah! &#124; NavinoT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=5185#comment-110273</guid>
		<description>[...] 5 poin selengkapnya di blog Robert Scoble. Mudah-mudahan Anda juga tertampar seperti halnya [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5 poin selengkapnya di blog Robert Scoble. Mudah-mudahan Anda juga tertampar seperti halnya [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keane Li</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/01/02/jpgs-dead-advertising-funded/comment-page-1/#comment-110272</link>
		<dc:creator>Keane Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=5185#comment-110272</guid>
		<description>I feel for the editor of JPG, who is a friend of mine. She really put a lot into the magazine. I&#039;d wish her luck if I thought she needed any.

On a side note, I&#039;ve recently discovered 52Clix.com (by yet another friend - I have lots of photography friends) which is more of a casual social network/photo competition site for photographers. It targets non-professionals in a more engaging and fun environment.

What holds true for photo sites holds true for all sites. Provide something people need, whether it be entertainment or education or both, and people will go to your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel for the editor of JPG, who is a friend of mine. She really put a lot into the magazine. I&#8217;d wish her luck if I thought she needed any.</p>
<p>On a side note, I&#8217;ve recently discovered 52Clix.com (by yet another friend &#8211; I have lots of photography friends) which is more of a casual social network/photo competition site for photographers. It targets non-professionals in a more engaging and fun environment.</p>
<p>What holds true for photo sites holds true for all sites. Provide something people need, whether it be entertainment or education or both, and people will go to your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CreativeWisdom</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/01/02/jpgs-dead-advertising-funded/comment-page-1/#comment-110294</link>
		<dc:creator>CreativeWisdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=5185#comment-110294</guid>
		<description>Interesting analogy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting analogy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/01/02/jpgs-dead-advertising-funded/comment-page-1/#comment-110293</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=5185#comment-110293</guid>
		<description>@Ari - Good eye; Everywhere mag was also published by JPG&#039;s parent 8020.

The point about delivering an audience that matches an advertising category and that catches people in a buying mood is well taken.  Generations ago major television networks and magazines like Life could mint money based on the sheer size of their audience but nowadays the audience must be properly targeted.  The one exception on the magazine side is People -- the world&#039;s most profitable magazine still does fine on a large, female general interest audience.  A lot of the profits come fron supermarket checkout lines and not advertisers, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ari &#8211; Good eye; Everywhere mag was also published by JPG&#8217;s parent 8020.</p>
<p>The point about delivering an audience that matches an advertising category and that catches people in a buying mood is well taken.  Generations ago major television networks and magazines like Life could mint money based on the sheer size of their audience but nowadays the audience must be properly targeted.  The one exception on the magazine side is People &#8212; the world&#8217;s most profitable magazine still does fine on a large, female general interest audience.  A lot of the profits come fron supermarket checkout lines and not advertisers, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
