<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scobleizer.com/2009/12/22/the-best-and-worst-thing-twitter-did-in-2009-rt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/12/22/the-best-and-worst-thing-twitter-did-in-2009-rt/</link>
	<description>Searching for world-changing technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec Perkins</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/12/22/the-best-and-worst-thing-twitter-did-in-2009-rt/comment-page-1/#comment-129554</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec Perkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 04:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=6124#comment-129554</guid>
		<description>Tweetie 2 definitely handles this the best, as far as I&#039;ve seen. Keeping &quot;Quote Tweet&quot; as an option, which is what the old RT really was, allows for editing the message before posting. The two click retweet makes the process frictionless.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t know why people are complaining, because they have the same behavior as before, if they want, and something new that&#039;s useful beyond just being an echo chamber (the metrics as you mentioned). You are right about the inconsistency problems, particularly between clients, but I think this will get worked out as clients are updated to fully take advantage of the new features. Clients that don&#039;t update will just lose users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tweetie 2 definitely handles this the best, as far as I&#39;ve seen. Keeping &#8220;Quote Tweet&#8221; as an option, which is what the old RT really was, allows for editing the message before posting. The two click retweet makes the process frictionless.</p>
<p>I don&#39;t know why people are complaining, because they have the same behavior as before, if they want, and something new that&#39;s useful beyond just being an echo chamber (the metrics as you mentioned). You are right about the inconsistency problems, particularly between clients, but I think this will get worked out as clients are updated to fully take advantage of the new features. Clients that don&#39;t update will just lose users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec Perkins</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/12/22/the-best-and-worst-thing-twitter-did-in-2009-rt/comment-page-1/#comment-124298</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec Perkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=6124#comment-124298</guid>
		<description>Tweetie 2 definitely handles this the best, as far as I&#039;ve seen. Keeping &quot;Quote Tweet&quot; as an option, which is what the old RT really was, allows for editing the message before posting. The two click retweet makes the process frictionless.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t know why people are complaining, because they have the same behavior as before, if they want, and something new that&#039;s useful beyond just being an echo chamber (the metrics as you mentioned). You are right about the inconsistency problems, particularly between clients, but I think this will get worked out as clients are updated to fully take advantage of the new features. Clients that don&#039;t update will just lose users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tweetie 2 definitely handles this the best, as far as I&#39;ve seen. Keeping &#8220;Quote Tweet&#8221; as an option, which is what the old RT really was, allows for editing the message before posting. The two click retweet makes the process frictionless.</p>
<p>I don&#39;t know why people are complaining, because they have the same behavior as before, if they want, and something new that&#39;s useful beyond just being an echo chamber (the metrics as you mentioned). You are right about the inconsistency problems, particularly between clients, but I think this will get worked out as clients are updated to fully take advantage of the new features. Clients that don&#39;t update will just lose users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nusret</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/12/22/the-best-and-worst-thing-twitter-did-in-2009-rt/comment-page-1/#comment-124288</link>
		<dc:creator>nusret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=6124#comment-124288</guid>
		<description>Thank you for article! &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yuregininsesi.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.yuregininsesi.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for article! <br /><a href="http://www.yuregininsesi.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.yuregininsesi.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teresa Bowers</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/12/22/the-best-and-worst-thing-twitter-did-in-2009-rt/comment-page-1/#comment-124282</link>
		<dc:creator>Teresa Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=6124#comment-124282</guid>
		<description>Right, and now for something completely different. (Re-tweet this)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, and now for something completely different. (Re-tweet this)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommorris</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/12/22/the-best-and-worst-thing-twitter-did-in-2009-rt/comment-page-1/#comment-124271</link>
		<dc:creator>tommorris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=6124#comment-124271</guid>
		<description>I have to say: the old way of doing retweets SUCKED. The fact that the new way doesnt&#039; let you edit the post is something I consider a major feature. And Twitter are right: the old way really does suck and need to die. That Twitter were willing to make a feature that&#039;s clealy implemented rather than kow-towing to the retweet crowd is a good thing. That it&#039;s pissed off a few people is not a bug, it&#039;s a feature.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve never understood the retweet thing. Back when it started, you had the social media crowd who seemed to spend all day in TweetDeck pushing the RT button like some kind of robotic army of Pavlovian dogs - and with all the creativity, ingenuity and imagination of a chicken trained to push buttons repeatedly to get food pellets. Why not, err, come up with something to say for yourself? Imagine going to a dinner party where nobody says anything of their own accord - nobody expresses any opinions or ideas of their own, but just mindlessly repeats other people&#039;s statements. That was Twitter for a while. That Twitter have introduced a feature that might make it possible to filter out that shit is one of the best things they did this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say: the old way of doing retweets SUCKED. The fact that the new way doesnt&#39; let you edit the post is something I consider a major feature. And Twitter are right: the old way really does suck and need to die. That Twitter were willing to make a feature that&#39;s clealy implemented rather than kow-towing to the retweet crowd is a good thing. That it&#39;s pissed off a few people is not a bug, it&#39;s a feature.</p>
<p>I&#39;ve never understood the retweet thing. Back when it started, you had the social media crowd who seemed to spend all day in TweetDeck pushing the RT button like some kind of robotic army of Pavlovian dogs &#8211; and with all the creativity, ingenuity and imagination of a chicken trained to push buttons repeatedly to get food pellets. Why not, err, come up with something to say for yourself? Imagine going to a dinner party where nobody says anything of their own accord &#8211; nobody expresses any opinions or ideas of their own, but just mindlessly repeats other people&#39;s statements. That was Twitter for a while. That Twitter have introduced a feature that might make it possible to filter out that shit is one of the best things they did this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @janole</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/12/22/the-best-and-worst-thing-twitter-did-in-2009-rt/comment-page-1/#comment-124263</link>
		<dc:creator>@janole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=6124#comment-124263</guid>
		<description>Worst thing about the new Retweet feature is - as adelaidedj pointed out - that retweets don&#039;t show up in your @ mentions anymore.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is a serious problem for Twitter clients, because - afaik - it&#039;s almost impossible to create a list of retweets of your own tweets via the retweet API calls. You&#039;d quickly run out of API calls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worst thing about the new Retweet feature is &#8211; as adelaidedj pointed out &#8211; that retweets don&#39;t show up in your @ mentions anymore.</p>
<p>This is a serious problem for Twitter clients, because &#8211; afaik &#8211; it&#39;s almost impossible to create a list of retweets of your own tweets via the retweet API calls. You&#39;d quickly run out of API calls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

