<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Privacy Reboot Needed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scobleizer.com/2010/05/15/privacy-reboot-needed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/05/15/privacy-reboot-needed/</link>
	<description>Searching for world-changing technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 05:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellie K</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/05/15/privacy-reboot-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-131514</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellie K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 14:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=6484#comment-131514</guid>
		<description>Not everyone is like you (the Scobleizer). Now hold up a sec, I&#039;m not going to flame or hate on you!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Given that many don&#039;t have home security, nor fully understand the reach of W3, LBS and electronic data in general,  they should know better and remember &quot;Buyer Beware!&quot;.  But it all depends to what degree you feel that people need to be protected from their own actions. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is very easy to overshare online, and  forget or be truly unaware of the potential reprecussions of one&#039;s actions, as most of us can&#039;t infer the progression of technological innovation.  It isn&#039;t like deciding whether or not to have unprotected sex, where the potential consequences are very well-known to all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not everyone is like you (the Scobleizer). Now hold up a sec, I&#39;m not going to flame or hate on you!  </p>
<p>Given that many don&#39;t have home security, nor fully understand the reach of W3, LBS and electronic data in general,  they should know better and remember &#8220;Buyer Beware!&#8221;.  But it all depends to what degree you feel that people need to be protected from their own actions. </p>
<p>It is very easy to overshare online, and  forget or be truly unaware of the potential reprecussions of one&#39;s actions, as most of us can&#39;t infer the progression of technological innovation.  It isn&#39;t like deciding whether or not to have unprotected sex, where the potential consequences are very well-known to all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Click</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/05/15/privacy-reboot-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-130762</link>
		<dc:creator>Click</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 00:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=6484#comment-130762</guid>
		<description>Dislike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dislike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/05/15/privacy-reboot-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-130761</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 23:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=6484#comment-130761</guid>
		<description>Privacy is exceedingly important. Companies love for you to think that your privacy is not worth much, but it is. There is going to be a backlash and it&#039;s not too far off. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like my privacy. A lot. I also like having friends, but my friends are all real people, not virtual friends. I have a real life in a real city. I have a real family. I listen to real music. I don&#039;t need someone to tell me what I should be interested in. I listen to the same stuff I grew up with and I couldn&#039;t be happier. There are very few new artists I find even remotely interesting. No one rocks like AC/DC and no one ever will short of them being cloned.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I use Linux or one of the BSDs, I manage my own domain and email and I keep to myself. I can do a vanity search of myself on Google or any other search engine and come up with absolutely nothing at all. I don&#039;t want to be found, emailed, or texted by anyone I&#039;m not already communicating with. I like being anonymous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Privacy is exceedingly important. Companies love for you to think that your privacy is not worth much, but it is. There is going to be a backlash and it&#39;s not too far off. </p>
<p>I like my privacy. A lot. I also like having friends, but my friends are all real people, not virtual friends. I have a real life in a real city. I have a real family. I listen to real music. I don&#39;t need someone to tell me what I should be interested in. I listen to the same stuff I grew up with and I couldn&#39;t be happier. There are very few new artists I find even remotely interesting. No one rocks like AC/DC and no one ever will short of them being cloned.</p>
<p>I use Linux or one of the BSDs, I manage my own domain and email and I keep to myself. I can do a vanity search of myself on Google or any other search engine and come up with absolutely nothing at all. I don&#39;t want to be found, emailed, or texted by anyone I&#39;m not already communicating with. I like being anonymous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Weinstein</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/05/15/privacy-reboot-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-130746</link>
		<dc:creator>David Weinstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=6484#comment-130746</guid>
		<description>This post seems a bit more reasoned and balanced than the one from May 8 about Much Ado about privacy on FB. Yet still people here raise valid counterpoints and objections. The bottom line is that unless the settings of a given service balance a common denominator among most or all of its users and then give them the option to change it as they see fit, it fails in the area of customer service and satisfaction given that not everyone agrees or subscribes to the same points of view about this topic. So follow the money. Who stands to gain monetarily from this grandstanding of smoke and mirrors about rethinking privacy on the internet or with a given service? Talk to all these corporations about information  security. Are you telling me 4Square and FB dont have InfoSec/Security departments dedicated to protecting resources and privacy of corporate data and offices?! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is to the advantage of a business to share the things that will make them more marketable and &quot;liked&quot; by customers. Therefore it is disingenuous for a CEO et all to claim they have nothing to hide and will share all their information. They&#039;re only sharing what they want you to know. And so should you! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In terms of the common denominator of user settings, not everyone wants to live like a celebrity or have their 15 minutes. The actions of sites like FB are promoting our society&#039;s all pervasive marketing driven cult of celebrity and vacuous drive for people to do anything to gain celebrity and attention via things like reality shows. The internet and FB et all are now one big reality show albiet quite orchestrated by the powers that be for their own benefit. Remember that while a winner of American Idol sacrifices their privacy in a real way for monetary gain like any other celebrity, regular people still have a choice and it can be found in the privacy and account settings on FB and what you choose to share or not or to simply opt out. Caveat Emptor!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post seems a bit more reasoned and balanced than the one from May 8 about Much Ado about privacy on FB. Yet still people here raise valid counterpoints and objections. The bottom line is that unless the settings of a given service balance a common denominator among most or all of its users and then give them the option to change it as they see fit, it fails in the area of customer service and satisfaction given that not everyone agrees or subscribes to the same points of view about this topic. So follow the money. Who stands to gain monetarily from this grandstanding of smoke and mirrors about rethinking privacy on the internet or with a given service? Talk to all these corporations about information  security. Are you telling me 4Square and FB dont have InfoSec/Security departments dedicated to protecting resources and privacy of corporate data and offices?! </p>
<p>It is to the advantage of a business to share the things that will make them more marketable and &#8220;liked&#8221; by customers. Therefore it is disingenuous for a CEO et all to claim they have nothing to hide and will share all their information. They&#39;re only sharing what they want you to know. And so should you! </p>
<p>In terms of the common denominator of user settings, not everyone wants to live like a celebrity or have their 15 minutes. The actions of sites like FB are promoting our society&#39;s all pervasive marketing driven cult of celebrity and vacuous drive for people to do anything to gain celebrity and attention via things like reality shows. The internet and FB et all are now one big reality show albiet quite orchestrated by the powers that be for their own benefit. Remember that while a winner of American Idol sacrifices their privacy in a real way for monetary gain like any other celebrity, regular people still have a choice and it can be found in the privacy and account settings on FB and what you choose to share or not or to simply opt out. Caveat Emptor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deceth</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/05/15/privacy-reboot-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-130742</link>
		<dc:creator>deceth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 18:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=6484#comment-130742</guid>
		<description>That would be inconvenient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be inconvenient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahad Bokhari</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/05/15/privacy-reboot-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-130715</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahad Bokhari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 14:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=6484#comment-130715</guid>
		<description>Well articulated Robert +1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well articulated Robert +1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

