Reading Comprehension and other controversies

Rob Lagesse doesn’t believe I actually read (or contribute to) many things that come through my RSS feeds. Or on my link blog.

First off, I’ve read everything on my link blog. Often twice. Why twice? Because I read that stuff in my feed reader (right now it’s Google Reader) and then I usually visit the item’s originating page. Why? To check on comments. Comments, I’ve learned, are often some of the most interesting things.

But, it’s interesting to have a discussion about just what is “reading” anyway.

There’s two separate styles of reading that I notice I’m in. One is a “grazing” style of reading where I’m just looking at the item and doing some quick pattern recognition on it.

Tell me, do you need to read all 600 words of a Viagra ad before you know it’s spam and before you’ll delete it? No. I don’t even need to read past the headline. My mind is very attuned to whether something is good or not right away.

Our minds are awesome pattern recognizers. After all, if I flash a picture of a tree in front of you for 1/30th of a second and then ask you what it is, you’ll answer “tree” every single time. How does your mind do that? Even our best image recognizers (er, like Riya) have trouble doing that in a lot longer than 1/30th of a second.

So, when I look at my feeds, that’s what I’m doing. Just looking and deciding whether something is interesting or not. I look at it like a quality control person on an almond line does. Where’s the good one? If I miss a couple of good ones that head toward the trash, who cares? I’d rather not let any bad ones get through this original processing.

Usually that gets it down to about 15 posts out of 100. OK, now we can read the items in more depth.

That’s when I switch from grazing mode to high comprehension mode. I read every sentence and see if it’s something I’m really interested in and if it is of high enough quality that I want to keep it around.

As to whether I’m part of the community or not, well, I only subscribe to a feed if I’m really interested in it. I have 577 feeds, all of which are high quality and usually about the tech industry.

My Google Reader right now reports:

 

From your 577 subscriptions, over the last 30 days you read 31,775 items, starred 2 items, and shared 1,696 items.

When it says I’ve read 31,775 items, that means I actually did look at those items. I usually ONLY use the “J” key and very rarely hit “Mark all as read.” Every single one of those 1,696 items was read by me, approved by me, and found interesting by me. Almost all of them are on the tech industry in some way. Very few duplicates (I hate duplicates, so if 400 bloggers are talking about the iPhone I only will post less than a handful and I actively look for the best posts).

I estimate about 30% of my items end up on TechMeme. Fewer on Digg. Although TechMeme seems to use my link blog as one of the things it learns from (it never gives credit, but invariably lately some of the things I put on my link blog pop up on TechMeme within an hour).

So, I guarantee I’ve looked at all these items.

Do you want me to take a day’s worth of items and explain why I found them interesting? I might do that as a video.

You can see some of my feed reading behavior (only the “pattern recognition” part) in my presentation from last Thursday. Just watch the first few minutes of my presentation, I show you what I was looking at in Google Reader and how I separate out the wheat from the chaff.

Social media overload

At LIFT we talked about Internet addiction, that turned into an article on the BBC. I spoke up and said that my addiction got me lots of benefits. More friends. Invites overseas. And lots of interesting experiences including dinner with Douglas Engelbart (still one of the highlights of my tech tour).

Well, I’m not overloaded enough, so today I’m adding all 719 of my Twitter followers as friends which means my home page is fast and furious. Why do that? So I can listen in on 719 of the world’s early adopters. That might be interesting. I might learn something. Or, I might just get overloaded. We’ll see. It certainly isn’t easy to do. Twitter wants to make it hard to add friends. Probably so their servers don’t get overloaded.

That leads Chris Saad to ask when we’re going to get overloaded? Oh, Chris, we’re well past that point. It’s just that by listening to a larger network I see trends earlier.

Oh, Francine Hardaway links to a video of the presentation I did on Thursday in Phoenix — she also linked to almost everything I talked about, which makes it seem like an info-dense presentation. I started it by showing how I read feeds in Google Reader.

Speaking of last week, I finally met Phil Windley (formerly Utah’s CIO) and someone shot an awesome photo of both of us in front of the Utah snow. Damn, I wanted to go skiing so bad. It was a real honor to meet Phil. He’s as smart and nice as he comes across in his blog.

Shahar Boyayan wrote about the Utah “Slopecast” presentation I gave and said she liked meeting me. I liked meeting her. Back at you Shahar and keep it up, sounds like you’re doing an awesome job helping businesses learn their way around this new world.

Along these lines Louis Gray has 10 ways to improve Google Reader. Oh, I should make a list too!

My first suggestion? Make a “read” item disappear instantly out of my “all items” view. I really hate seeing items I already read there.

Going to SXSW?

Are you going to SXSW? Here’s a survey. Answer in comments here.

1) Do you have an evening free while you’re at SXSW?
2) Which evening is it?
3) Do you like BBQ?
4) Will you have a car at SXSW?
5) Are you a video blogger or somehow involved in video media creation or distribution? (I need panelists)

I wanna go to BBQ and am looking for people to do that with. Where should we go?

Do’ers vs. Talkers

Scott Koon, who writes Lazy Coder, says he’s unsubscribed from all the non-coders in his life (like me and Chris Pirillo).

That’s cool. I haven’t unsubscribed from him. Why? Cause of my link blog. I want to see development trends before most other developers do. So, I follow a lot of “do’ers” as he puts them.

But, Scott, you might look at my video blog. Almost every interview is with a “do’er” (someone trying to build a company, or find the meaning of mass). Also, you might follow my link blog. I filter out only the best stuff out of 600 of the world’s top tech blogs — many of which are by “do’ers” like Scott says he is, not talkers like me.

I love how he tells people to stop reading blogs like mine and start reading others. Hmmm…

In the meantime, though. Matt Cutts of Google says that I read more feed items in Google Reader than any other human being alive. And I don’t know of a video blogger who has posted more interviews with more companies than I have.

So, I guess I’m both a “do’er” and a “talker.” Just subscribe to the blog that demonstrates the behavior you like most.

No code here, though. So, if that’s what you want, right, not good. If I were a coder, though, I’d just use Krugle to find some interesting stuff.

I love the Huffington Post

You can’t tell by watching my link blog (I very rarely post political stuff there) but I’ve been tracking a bunch of political blogs on both the right and left side of the aisle. I have to admit I like Huffington Post the best. Bob Cesca’s comeback to a study that showed that lefty blogs swear more than righty ones made me smile: “I like to use the F-Word a lot.”