<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scobleizer&#187; digital photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scobleizer.com/tag/digital-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scobleizer.com</link>
	<description>Searching for world-changing technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 05:45:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://scobleizer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Is Microsoft trying to capture photography market?</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/07/06/is-microsoft-trying-to-capture-photography-market/</link>
		<comments>http://scobleizer.com/2008/07/06/is-microsoft-trying-to-capture-photography-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 08:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/?p=4349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week Thomas Hawk (my favorite &#8220;Flickr-famous&#8221; photographer) and me will join a bunch of others on Microsoft&#8217;s campus up in Redmond, Washington, to attend a pro photography summit that Microsoft is hosting. Why is Microsoft hosting a bunch of professional photographers? Is it to kick off Microsoft&#8217;s Pro Photo Tools, Photosynth ( which got [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week <a href="http://www.thomashawk.com">Thomas Hawk</a> (my favorite &#8220;Flickr-famous&#8221; photographer) and me will join a bunch of others on Microsoft&#8217;s campus up in Redmond, Washington, to attend <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/prophoto/prosummit.aspx">a pro photography summit that Microsoft is hosting</a>.</p>
<p>Why is Microsoft hosting a bunch of professional photographers?</p>
<p>Is it to kick off <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/ProPhoto/">Microsoft&#8217;s Pro Photo Tools</a>, <a href="http://labs.live.com/photosynth/">Photosynth</a> ( which got me, in 2006, to say it was the demo of the year), or <a href="http://labs.live.com/Silverlight+2+Deep+Zoom.aspx">DeepZoom</a>? Maybe. After all, these things are really cool and photographers should flock to them in droves.</p>
<p>Is it because the digital photography market has finally gotten big enough to get Microsoft interested? Maybe.</p>
<p>But I think Microsoft has something else up its sleeve.</p>
<p>It knows that if Silverlight is going to have a chance against Flash it will have to get designers to give up Photoshop, or at least use other tools alongside.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Because designers now are in control of the toolset that many companies will chose. What&#8217;s the most important tool to these designers? Photoshop.</p>
<p>So, along comes a Microsoft salesperson trying to get Silverlight and the Microsoft toolset in the door. Things go well with the developers, because .NET code is a lot nicer than Flash stuff. The management likes the pitch too, because they probably will get a break on something else they are already buying (Office/Sharepoint/Exchange are all very popular inside most corporations). But then the team gets to the designers and they say &#8220;give up Photoshop? Over our dead bodies.&#8221; And the deal ends and the team chooses Adobe&#8217;s Flash. Adobe&#8217;s salespeople then get a call and they come over and show off Acrobat.com, which is a hit against Microsoft Office and you can see how this goes.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;ll be watching this week to see what&#8217;s really behind Microsoft&#8217;s moves into photography. Is it to do something really remarkable (which Photosynth and Deep Zoom are)? Or is it to switch designers from Adobe stuff?</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scobleizer.com/2008/07/06/is-microsoft-trying-to-capture-photography-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

