<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scobleizer &#187; Reader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scobleizer.com/tag/reader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scobleizer.com</link>
	<description>Exploring the 2010 Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:30:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://scobleizer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Why Amazon Kindle 2.0 won&#8217;t suck like 1.0</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/02/09/why-amazon-kindle-20-wont-suck-like-10/</link>
		<comments>http://scobleizer.com/2009/02/09/why-amazon-kindle-20-wont-suck-like-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.com/?p=5376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Remember my review of Amazon&#8217;s first Kindle? I thought it sucked. Almost all of my ire was aimed at its design. I couldn&#8217;t hold it or pass it to other people without it flipping pages and the UI looked like something Microsoft designed back in the late 1980s. In other words, it wasn&#8217;t pretty and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fscobleizer.com%2F2009%2F02%2F09%2Fwhy-amazon-kindle-20-wont-suck-like-10%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fscobleizer.com%2F2009%2F02%2F09%2Fwhy-amazon-kindle-20-wont-suck-like-10%2F&amp;source=scobleizer&amp;style=normal&amp;service=TinyURL.com" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://scobleizer.com/2007/11/25/dear-jeff-bezos-one-week-kindle-review/">Remember my review of Amazon&#8217;s first Kindle</a>? I thought it sucked. Almost all of my ire was aimed at its design. I couldn&#8217;t hold it or pass it to other people without it flipping pages and the UI looked like something Microsoft designed back in the late 1980s. In other words, it wasn&#8217;t pretty and it wasn&#8217;t very usable.</p>
<p>Of course that didn&#8217;t stop 500,000 from going out and buying one.</p>
<p>But this morning <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123413840248261571.html">Amazon will announce version 2.0</a>. I already ordered one. Why? Because the concept of the Kindle is really great.</p>
<p>&#8220;<a href="http://booksearch.blogspot.com/2009/02/15-million-books-in-your-pocket.html">But didn&#8217;t Google just release eBooks for mobile phones</a>, and won&#8217;t that make Kindle irrelevant,&#8221; I can hear some of you asking.</p>
<p>I am very excited by Google&#8217;s eBook initiative and have it on my iPhone already and talked with one of the people who runs that team yesterday, but even she is excited about the Kindle. Here&#8217;s why:</p>
<p>1. The Kindle has a screen that can be read outdoors. I live a few blocks from a RItz and I love going down there and doing some reading by the ocean. My iPhone or laptops are totally unsatisfactory there. The Kindle rocks. Its screen is one that uses a new reflective technology which makes it work great on the beach.<br />
2. My iPhone batteries already don&#8217;t last long enough and I save them for important stuff like, well, phone calls. The Kindle battery lasts a lot longer (I usually got more than eight hours when I had mine) so I can sit on the beach all day long and not worry that I&#8217;m using the battery in my phone which might keep me from getting an important call.<br />
3. The Kindle is optimized for reading books. Its screen is about the same size as a book. My iPhone screen is too small to make reading really long passages of text comfortable.<br />
4. With the Kindle there will be more first run new books available for Kindle because of Amazon&#8217;s deep relationships with the book publishing industry and also because the Kindle has a very good way for the industry to monetize &#8212; you can buy a new book over the Kindle&#8217;s wireless technology in just a minute or two.</p>
<p>So, why won&#8217;t it suck like version 1.0 did? Easy. I&#8217;ve seen <a href="http://www.mobileread.com/forums/showthread.php?t=38108">the leaked photos</a> and it is clear that they&#8217;ve put some thought into how people will hold it and hand it around. I&#8217;m also expecting a major UI update because they aren&#8217;t using the same navigation device that the first one did. Plus, I met Jeff Bezos last year and while he clearly didn&#8217;t like my first review it was also clear that he had listened and heard the criticism and went back to the drawing board with his team.</p>
<p>Over at <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com">FastCompany.com</a> we have someone over at the announcement this morning and will post an update there as soon as it gets published. I will again do a review of the new Kindle as soon as it is in my hot little hands. From what I&#8217;m hearing, though, this will be a breakthrough device that is much more popular than the first version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scobleizer.com/2009/02/09/why-amazon-kindle-20-wont-suck-like-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
