<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scobleizer &#187; websites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scobleizer.com/tag/websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scobleizer.com</link>
	<description>Exploring the 2010 Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>TechCrunch&#8217;s startups&#8217; web sites suck too</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/09/08/techcrunchs-startups-web-sites-suck-too/</link>
		<comments>http://scobleizer.com/2008/09/08/techcrunchs-startups-web-sites-suck-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tc50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/?p=4611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, I just visited the companies Web sites of the finalists for TC50. They mostly suck too. But this time I&#8217;m going to put the blame on the conference holders. Why do they suck? Because lots of them are like this one, which just has a form up because they can&#8217;t reveal anything about themselves [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/08/announcing-the-techcrunch50-finalists/">I just visited the companies Web sites of the finalists for TC50</a>. They mostly suck too. But this time I&#8217;m going to put the blame on the conference holders. Why do they suck? Because lots of them are <a href="http://www.angstro.com/">like this one</a>, which just has a form up because they can&#8217;t reveal anything about themselves before they get on stage.</p>
<p>This makes me realize that it&#8217;s the conference organizer&#8217;s fault. They should work with the startups to make sure that the startups&#8217; web presence &#8212; when the list goes out &#8212; is top rate and reflects well on both the startups and the conference itself.</p>
<p>So, in this first competition between Demo and TC50 both get a failing grade. I don&#8217;t think this helps any startup to have such a bad foot forward as first impression. Will everyone revisit this list on Wednesday? I don&#8217;t think so. We all have ADD and by Wednesday we&#8217;ll be waiting in some line at an Apple store for whatever Steve Jobs announces tomorrow.</p>
<p>That said, TC50&#8217;s site is better than Demo&#8217;s site because they took the time to explain a little bit about what each company will do and also how they&#8217;ll fit into the conference. I&#8217;m off to go to TC50, see ya from there if I can get Wifi.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch50.com/2008/conference/"><br />
TC50 will be live streamed as well</a>. That&#8217;s a win for startups because you can watch along from home. The show starts in a few minutes. Unfortunately Demo&#8217;s sessions won&#8217;t be live streamed. That&#8217;s too bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scobleizer.com/2008/09/08/techcrunchs-startups-web-sites-suck-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Startups: your web site sucks</title>
		<link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/09/06/startups-your-web-site-sucks/</link>
		<comments>http://scobleizer.com/2008/09/06/startups-your-web-site-sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/?p=4570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I visited each website from the list of Demo finalists.
Boy, do they suck. Really, really suck.
Does no one understand how to market themselves?
It&#8217;s amazing to me that not a single Demo website has learned from the lessons of Gary Vaynerchuk&#8217;s Winelibrary.tv. Now THAT is a Website that knows how to market! (Interesting that Gary runs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I visited each website from <a href="http://scobleizer.com/2008/09/06/lets-cry-for-the-poor-fragmented-underreported-startups/">the list of Demo finalists</a>.</p>
<p>Boy, do they suck. Really, really suck.</p>
<p>Does no one understand how to market themselves?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing to me that not a single Demo website has learned from the lessons of Gary Vaynerchuk&#8217;s <a href="http://www.winelibrary.tv">Winelibrary.tv</a>. Now THAT is a Website that knows how to market! (Interesting that Gary runs a wine store that sells $50 million a year, yet no one looks at his style as a great way to market your service/product yet).</p>
<p>Almost no company on this list is using video. Amazing that in this age of YouTube that statups aren&#8217;t understanding how to use video, or are even trying to use it.</p>
<p>But some are far worse. <a href="http://www.eirlift.com/">Mapflow&#8217;s company&#8217;s site only has a password protect up for it</a>. Amazingly bad, especially since there are probably thousands of people who will get that as their first experience with this company.</p>
<p>Some other mistakes?</p>
<p>1. Lots of companies have Demo badges, but don&#8217;t welcome Demo visitors. Who cares that you&#8217;re going to show off at Demo? We do care about what the news will be. So, include something like &#8220;on Tuesday you&#8217;ll learn how we&#8217;ll solve xxxx problem.&#8221;<br />
2. Photrade&#8217;s website gave me an error.<br />
3. Some, <a href="http://www.plasticlogic.com/">like Plastic Electronics</a>, just have a lame Demo logo and a sign that says &#8220;world leader in plastic electronics.&#8221; Who cares? What do you do? What is plastic electronics? Or, worse, look at <a href="http://www.semantifind.com/">Semantifind</a>. Can&#8217;t they at least put up a few words about what problem they will solve and collect an email address? Remember, this is my first impression of these companies. Lame, lame, lame, lame, lame and, no, I won&#8217;t be back. Sorry. <a href="http://www.usable.com/">Usable </a>says &#8220;come see us at Demo.&#8221; Um, out of all the visitors to your Web site this weekend how many are going to Demo? I&#8217;d guess almost none. After all, if you were going to Demo you&#8217;d be drinking beer in the bar right now, not checking out the list of startups.<br />
4. Some, <a href="http://www.openacircle.com/">like Open a Circle</a>, seem to aim at a problem that doesn&#8217;t exist or seem to be too early. They could really help their case by explaining the pain point that they solve.<br />
5. Too many words, <a href="http://www.radiantlogic.com/main/">like this site at Radiant Logic</a>. I fell asleep as soon as I saw the site. Oh, and lame stock photo too.<br />
6. We&#8217;re a &#8220;me too&#8221; company, like <a href="http://www.wildpockets.com/">Wild Pockets</a> which looks to me like a copy of Kongregate but Wild Pocket&#8217;s doesn&#8217;t explain differentiating factor.<br />
7. <a href="http://www.toolgether.com/">ToolTogether</a> just gave me a form without explaining a thing about their company. That&#8217;s ultra lame. I can&#8217;t believe how bad these companies are.<br />
8. Visit <a href="http://www.trinityconvergence.com/">this website for Trinity Convergence</a> for 10 seconds. Click close. Now tell me what they do. Buzzwords!!! Convergence? Multimedia? Embedded devices? Mushy marketing and I still don&#8217;t know what they do, the value they bring, the pain they solve.<br />
9. Solves problems that don&#8217;t exist. <a href="http://www.turnto.com/">This site, TurnTo,</a> wants you to use your friends to solve problems, or find products. Um, Twitter already solved that. Facebook has all my friends. And I&#8217;m not going to get them all to join a new service, sorry. Especially one that uses lame stock photography.<br />
10. I don&#8217;t know what <a href="http://www.ubiest.com/">this service</a> does, but I know that it won some prize from some conference that doesn&#8217;t matter. The site isn&#8217;t even in English. Sigh.<br />
11. <a href="http://www.ugadigital.com/">UGA Digital has probably the worst example of marketing</a> I&#8217;ve ever seen. It&#8217;s the antithesis of what Gary Vaynerchuk does. Who cares whether your team is in multiple countries? I love companies that claim they have &#8220;boundless imagination.&#8221; Certainly isn&#8217;t demonstrated on their Web site.<br />
12. &#8220;<a href="http://www.unitysolutions.com/">Download Unity Solutions info sheet</a>.&#8221; Ugh, FAIL!<br />
13. Wait a second, <a href="http://www.zazengo.com/">this company</a> wants to make a difference in the world? Why the hell are they spending $18,000 to go to Demo? They could have just donated that much money to some interesting charity and gotten more PR.</p>
<p>Ones that caught my eye?</p>
<p>1. <a href="http://www.quantivo.com/">Quantivo</a>. Nice design, gets to the point. Uses video. Makes me want to click into the site.</p>
<p>Um, I visited every single company on the Demo list. Amazingly lame companies. Amazingly lame web sites. Is this it? Am I missing something? How did these companies get $18,000 to go to Demo?</p>
<p>Would you write about any of these companies? Did any of them solve a problem you have? Would any of you fund any of these companies?</p>
<p>My answer? No. No. No. Sorry Demo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scobleizer.com/2008/09/06/startups-your-web-site-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>153</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
